Matches in Nanopublications for { ?s ?p <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2025.101069> ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 20 of
20
with 100 items per page.
- The%20mean%20and%20median%20buffer%20widths%20were%207.0%20m%20and%205.7%20m%2C%20respectively. obtainsSupportFrom j.tfp.2025.101069 assertion.
- Eighty-five%20percent%20of%20the%20buffers%20were%20narrower%20than%20the%20prescribed%20standard%20width%20of%20minimum%2010%20m. obtainsSupportFrom j.tfp.2025.101069 assertion.
- Forty-six%20percent%20of%20the%20stands%20still%20met%20certification%20requirements%20due%20to%20exemptions%20allowing%20reduced%20buffer%20widths. obtainsSupportFrom j.tfp.2025.101069 assertion.
- Harvested%20trees%20had%20a%20greater%20mean%20diameter%20at%20root%20collar%20%2830.6%20cm%29%20than%20the%20non-harvested%20trees%20%2812.3%20cm%29. obtainsSupportFrom j.tfp.2025.101069 assertion.
- The%20mean%20tree%20volume%20in%20the%20group%20of%20harvested%20trees%20was%200.4%20m%C2%B3%2C%20while%20the%20mean%20tree%20volume%20in%20the%20group%20of%20non-harvested%20trees%20was%200.1%20m%C2%B3. obtainsSupportFrom j.tfp.2025.101069 assertion.
- The%20mean%20root%20collar%20diameter%20for%20living%20trees%20was%20reduced%20post-harvest%20%2811.8%20cm%29%20compared%20to%20pre-harvest%20%2815.8%20cm%29. obtainsSupportFrom j.tfp.2025.101069 assertion.
- No%20site%20characteristics%20could%20explain%20the%20narrow%20buffers. obtainsSupportFrom j.tfp.2025.101069 assertion.
- Fifty-four%20percent%20of%20the%20stands%20were%20non-compliant%20with%20PEFC%20requirements. obtainsSupportFrom j.tfp.2025.101069 assertion.
- Narrow%20buffers%20%28%3C%205.0%20m%29%20showed%20no%20significant%20differences%20in%20pre-harvest%20tree%20diameter%20variation%20%28Gini%20coefficient%29%20compared%20to%20wider%20buffers%20%28%E2%89%A5%205%20m%29. obtainsSupportFrom j.tfp.2025.101069 assertion.
- Mean%20buffer%20widths%20in%20stands%20next%20to%20lakes%2C%20rivers%2C%20and%20streams%20were%2011.4%20m%2C%206.9%20m%2C%20and%203.7%20m%2C%20respectively%2C%20being%20significantly%20different. obtainsSupportFrom j.tfp.2025.101069 assertion.
- The%20mean%20buffer%20width%20was%208.3%20m%20in%20Bilberry%20woodland%2C%206.9%20m%20in%20Lingonberry-bilberry%20woodland%2C%20and%201.5%20m%20in%20Low-herb%20woodland%2C%20with%20significant%20differences%20between%20vegetation%20types. obtainsSupportFrom j.tfp.2025.101069 assertion.
- There%20was%20a%20weak%2C%20significant%2C%20negative%20relationship%20between%20pre-harvest%20Gini%20coefficient%20for%20all%20trees%20and%20buffer%20width. obtainsSupportFrom j.tfp.2025.101069 assertion.
- The%20difference%20in%20the%20occurrence%20of%20driving%20in%20the%20riparian%20buffer%20between%20Good%20and%20Substandard%20practice%20groups%20was%20significant. obtainsSupportFrom j.tfp.2025.101069 assertion.
- The%20removal%20of%20broadleaved%20trees%20was%20significantly%20more%20frequent%20in%20the%20Substandard%20practice%20group. obtainsSupportFrom j.tfp.2025.101069 assertion.
- The%20number%20of%20harvested%20stumps%20per%20hectare%20was%20significantly%20higher%20in%20the%20Substandard%20practice%20group. obtainsSupportFrom j.tfp.2025.101069 assertion.
- Only%2042%25%20of%20the%20inspected%20riparian%20forest%20buffers%20fully%20adhered%20to%20the%20certification%20standards%20for%20forest%20management. obtainsSupportFrom j.tfp.2025.101069 assertion.
- Adherence%20to%20certification%20standards%20was%20significantly%20lower%20in%20privately%20owned%20forests%20%2835%25%29%20compared%20to%20publicly%20owned%20forests%20%2861%25%29. obtainsSupportFrom j.tfp.2025.101069 assertion.
- Buffers%20along%20streams%20classified%20as%20%27small%27%20%28width%20%3C%205m%29%20had%2028%25%20adherence%20to%20certification%20standards%2C%20compared%20to%2056%25%20adherence%20for%20%27large%27%20streams%20%28width%20%3E%2020m%29. obtainsSupportFrom j.tfp.2025.101069 assertion.
- Forested%20buffers%20wider%20than%2030%20meters%20showed%20a%2078%25%20adherence%20rate%20to%20certification%20standards%2C%20while%20buffers%20narrower%20than%2010%20meters%20showed%20only%2019%25%20adherence. obtainsSupportFrom j.tfp.2025.101069 assertion.
- Regions%20with%20higher%20average%20rainfall%20exhibited%20lower%20adherence%20to%20riparian%20buffer%20standards%20%2833%25%29%20than%20drier%20regions%20%2852%25%29. obtainsSupportFrom j.tfp.2025.101069 assertion.