Nanopublications LDF server

Matches in Nanopublications for { ?s ?p <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-023-01464-x> ?g. }

• Charring%20rates%20for%20the%20flanges%20were%200.40%E2%80%930.76%20mm%2Fmin%20and%200.54%E2%80%931.72%20mm%2Fmin%20for%20the%20protected%20and%20post-protected%20phase%2C%20respectively. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• Charring%20rates%20decreased%20with%20increasing%20flange%20size. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• Charring%20rates%20for%20flanges%20of%20solid%20wood%20and%20LVL%20were%20comparable. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• Lateral%20charring%20of%20I-joist%20flanges%20can%20be%20significant%20in%20the%20protected%20phase. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• The%20tested%20insulation%20products%20showed%20a%20lower%20recession%20rate%20than%20values%20reported%20for%20glass%20wool%20insulation. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• The%20low%20recession%20rates%20compared%20to%20previously%20reported%20generic%20values%20can%20be%20explained%20by%20better%20product-specific%20properties%2C%20negligible%20shrinking%2C%20and%20a%20slightly%20different%20test%20setup. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• Charring%20rates%20in%20the%20protected%20phase%20were%20on%20average%200.14%20mm%2Fmin%20lower%20than%20predicted%20by%20EN%201995-1-2%20and%200.05%20mm%2Fmin%20lower%20than%20predicted%20by%20prEN%201995-1-2. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• Recession%20rate%20of%20insulation%20measured%20at%20flange%20corners%20was%20lower%20than%20in%20the%20middle%20of%20the%20insulation. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• Insulation%20fall-down%20occurred%20after%20gypsum%20board%20fall-off%2C%20with%20cellulose%20loose-fill%20remaining%20in%20place%20longer%20than%20wood%20fibre%20loose-fill. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• The%20compression%20and%20oversizing%20of%20wood%20fibre%20batt%20insulation%20helped%20prevent%20fall-down%20during%20testing. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• The%20charring%20rates%20for%20an%20I-joist%20with%20flanges%20of%20solid%20wood%20and%20Laminated%20Veneer%20Lumber%20are%20comparable. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• The%20charring%20rates%20in%20the%20protected%20phase%20varied%20between%200.40%20mm%2Fmin%20and%200.76%20mm%2Fmin. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• The%20charring%20rate%20decreased%20with%20increasing%20flange%20size. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• The%20charring%20rate%20during%20the%20post-protected%20phase%20varied%20from%200.54%20mm%2Fmin%20to%201.72%20mm%2Fmin. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• The%20uncertainty%20of%20the%20measurements%20was%20highest%20for%20the%20post-protected%20phase. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• All%20charring%20rates%20of%20the%20I-joists%20in%20the%20protected%20phase%20were%20lower%20than%20the%20calculated%20values%20of%20rectangular%20cross-sections%20in%20EN%201995-1-2%3A2004. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• Compared%20to%20the%20new%20design%20method%20for%20I-joists%20in%20the%20final%20draft%20of%20prEN%201995-1-2%3A2021%2C%20there%20was%20a%20better%20match%20between%20experimental%20and%20calculated%20charring%20rates%20and%20the%20discrepancies%20were%20mainly%20on%20the%20conservative%20side. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• The%20remaining%20cross-section%20area%20of%20all%20I-joist%20flanges%20had%20a%20trapezoid-like%20or%20rounded%20shape%2C%20which%20is%20characteristic%20of%20lateral%20charring. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• Several%20flanges%20were%20heavily%20charred%20on%20the%20lateral%20side%2C%20although%20there%20was%20barely%20any%20post-protected%20phase. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• Lateral%20charring%20of%20the%20flanges%20of%20an%20I-joist%20can%20be%20significant%20in%20the%20protected%20phase. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• Overall%2C%20the%20insulation%20stayed%20well%20in%20place%20after%20gypsum%20board%20fall-off. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• In%20most%20tests%2C%20the%20insulation%20was%20still%20in%20its%20place%20at%20the%20end%20of%20the%20test. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• The%20I-joist%20profile%20has%20a%20positive%20impact%20on%20keeping%20the%20insulation%20in%20its%20place. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• All%20four%20insulation%20products%20showed%20a%20lower%20recession%20rate%20than%20typical%20values%20reported%20for%20glass%20wool%20insulation. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• The%20difference%20in%20recession%20rates%20was%20more%20pronounced%20for%20the%20wood%20fibre%20and%20cellulose%20insulations. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• The%20recession%20rates%20were%20at%20the%20lower%20end%20of%20previously%20reported%20values%20for%20these%20types%20of%20insulation. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• The%20cellulose%20loose-fill%20insulation%20had%20the%20lowest%20recession%20rate%20at%201.1%20mm%2Fmin. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• The%20cellulose%20loose-fill%20insulation%20recession%20rate%20of%201.1%20mm%2Fmin%20is%20lower%20than%20any%20value%20reported%20previously%20for%20combustible%20insulations. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• The%20recession%20rates%20in%20this%20test%20series%20were%20mainly%20measured%20in%20the%20protected%20phase%2C%20while%20reported%20values%20are%20often%20reported%20for%20the%20post-protected%20phase. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.