Matches in Nanopublications for { ?s ?p ?o <https://w3id.org/np/RAxZ0qev1P7TROw0baRlrMOXuB7jtESos3IErGOOFmbQs/assertion>. }
Showing items 1 to 20 of
20
with 100 items per page.
- 978-3-030-61244-3_7 type BookChapter assertion.
- author-list _1 0000-0002-7114-6459 assertion.
- author-list _2 0000-0002-1267-0234 assertion.
- author-list _3 0000-0002-3357-9130 assertion.
- 0000-0002-1267-0234 name "Tobias Kuhn" assertion.
- 0000-0002-3357-9130 name "Davide Ceolin" assertion.
- 0000-0002-7114-6459 name "Cristina-Iulia Bucur" assertion.
- 008xxew50 name "Department of Computer Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands" assertion.
- 00x7ekv49 name "Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica, Amsterdam, Netherlands" assertion.
- 978-3-030-61244-3_7 title "A Unified Nanopublication Model for Effective and User-Friendly Access to the Elements of Scientific Publishing" assertion.
- 0302-9743 title "Lecture Notes in Computer Science" assertion.
- 978-3-030-61244-3_7 date "2020" assertion.
- 978-3-030-61244-3_7 isPartOf 0302-9743 assertion.
- 978-3-030-61244-3_7 abstract "Scientific publishing is the means by which we communicate and share scientific knowledge, but this process currently often lacks transparency and machine-interpretable representations. Scientific articles are published in long coarse-grained text with complicated structures, and they are optimized for human readers and not for automated means of organization and access. Peer reviewing is the main method of quality assessment, but these peer reviews are nowadays rarely published and their own complicated structure and linking to the respective articles is not accessible. In order to address these problems and to better align scientific publishing with the principles of the Web and Linked Data, we propose here an approach to use nanopublications as a unifying model to represent in a semantic way the elements of publications, their assessments, as well as the involved processes, actors, and provenance in general. To evaluate our approach, we present a dataset of 627 nanopublications representing an interlinked network of the elements of articles (such as individual paragraphs) and their reviews (such as individual review comments). Focusing on the specific scenario of editors performing a meta-review, we introduce seven competency questions and show how they can be executed as SPARQL queries. We then present a prototype of a user interface for that scenario that shows different views on the set of review comments provided for a given manuscript, and we show in a user study that editors find the interface useful to answer their competency questions. In summary, we demonstrate that a unified and semantic publication model based on nanopublications can make scientific communication more effective and user-friendly." assertion.
- 0000-0002-1267-0234 affiliation 008xxew50 assertion.
- 0000-0002-3357-9130 affiliation 00x7ekv49 assertion.
- 0000-0002-7114-6459 affiliation 008xxew50 assertion.
- 978-3-030-61244-3_7 authorList author-list assertion.
- 978-3-030-61244-3_7 pageEnd "119" assertion.
- 978-3-030-61244-3_7 pageStart "104" assertion.