Nanopublications LDF server

Matches in Nanopublications for { ?s <http://purl.org/spar/cito/obtainsSupportFrom> ?o ?g. }

• Element%20availability%20was%20higher%20in%20bare%20soil%20compared%20to%20soil%20covered%20with%20lichens. obtainsSupportFrom j.funeco.2025.101461 assertion.
• Element%20availability%20was%20higher%20in%20bare%20soil%20compared%20to%20soil%20covered%20with%20lichens. obtainsSupportFrom V6B2HV assertion.
• Availability%20of%20Ca%2C%20Mg%2C%20and%20Zn%20was%20lower%20in%20soil%20beneath%20Cladonia%20rangiferina%2Fstygia%20than%20below%20Flavocetraria%20nivalis. obtainsSupportFrom j.funeco.2025.101461 assertion.
• Availability%20of%20Ca%2C%20Mg%2C%20and%20Zn%20was%20lower%20in%20soil%20beneath%20Cladonia%20rangiferina%2Fstygia%20than%20below%20Flavocetraria%20nivalis. obtainsSupportFrom V6B2HV assertion.
• Element%20availability%20increased%20with%20average%20soil%20temperature. obtainsSupportFrom j.funeco.2025.101461 assertion.
• Element%20availability%20increased%20with%20average%20soil%20temperature. obtainsSupportFrom V6B2HV assertion.
• Element%20availability%20increased%20with%20the%20number%20of%20freeze-thaw%20cycles. obtainsSupportFrom j.funeco.2025.101461 assertion.
• Element%20availability%20increased%20with%20the%20number%20of%20freeze-thaw%20cycles. obtainsSupportFrom V6B2HV assertion.
• The%20dataset%20provides%20a%20step-by-step%20cut%20to%20remove%20shoulder%2C%20ham%20and%20split%20ribs%20of%2025%20pigs%20laid%20horizontally. obtainsSupportFrom j.dib.2022.107945 assertion.
• The%20dataset%20provides%20a%20step-by-step%20cut%20to%20remove%20shoulder%2C%20ham%20and%20split%20ribs%20of%2025%20pigs%20laid%20horizontally. obtainsSupportFrom GDGHZR assertion.
• The%20dataset%20includes%20RGB%2C%20depth%2C%20intrinsic%20and%20extrinsic%20parameters%20for%20each%20camera%20position. obtainsSupportFrom j.dib.2022.107945 assertion.
• The%20dataset%20includes%20RGB%2C%20depth%2C%20intrinsic%20and%20extrinsic%20parameters%20for%20each%20camera%20position. obtainsSupportFrom GDGHZR assertion.
• The%20repeatability%20of%20the%20robotic%20arm%20used%20for%20data%20capture%20in%202021%20is%200.06%20mm. obtainsSupportFrom j.dib.2022.107945 assertion.
• The%20repeatability%20of%20the%20robotic%20arm%20used%20for%20data%20capture%20in%202021%20is%200.06%20mm. obtainsSupportFrom GDGHZR assertion.
• The%20left%20side%20of%20the%20pig%20was%20captured%20in%20more%20detail%20following%20a%20cut-by-cut%20process%2C%20while%20the%20right%20side%20was%20imaged%20at%20key%20stages%20due%20to%20time%20constraints. obtainsSupportFrom j.dib.2022.107945 assertion.
• The%20left%20side%20of%20the%20pig%20was%20captured%20in%20more%20detail%20following%20a%20cut-by-cut%20process%2C%20while%20the%20right%20side%20was%20imaged%20at%20key%20stages%20due%20to%20time%20constraints. obtainsSupportFrom GDGHZR assertion.
• The%20first%2060%20frames%20of%20every%20capture%20using%20the%20frame%20structure%20were%20discarded%20due%20to%20exposure%20correction%20variations. obtainsSupportFrom j.dib.2022.107945 assertion.
• The%20first%2060%20frames%20of%20every%20capture%20using%20the%20frame%20structure%20were%20discarded%20due%20to%20exposure%20correction%20variations. obtainsSupportFrom GDGHZR assertion.
• The%202020%20data%20used%20a%20bespoke%20frame%20with%20six%20cameras%2C%20while%20the%202021%20data%20used%20a%20single%20camera%20attached%20to%20a%20robotic%20arm. obtainsSupportFrom j.dib.2022.107945 assertion.
• The%202020%20data%20used%20a%20bespoke%20frame%20with%20six%20cameras%2C%20while%20the%202021%20data%20used%20a%20single%20camera%20attached%20to%20a%20robotic%20arm. obtainsSupportFrom GDGHZR assertion.
• The%20dataset%20includes%20records%20of%20500%20creative%20works%20%28including%2077%20digital%20games%2C%20190%20digital%20artworks%20and%20233%20movies%2C%20novels%20and%20other%20narratives%29%20that%20use%20or%20represent%20machine%20vision%20technologies. obtainsSupportFrom j.dib.2022.108319 assertion.
• The%20dataset%20includes%20records%20of%20500%20creative%20works%20%28including%2077%20digital%20games%2C%20190%20digital%20artworks%20and%20233%20movies%2C%20novels%20and%20other%20narratives%29%20that%20use%20or%20represent%20machine%20vision%20technologies. obtainsSupportFrom 2G0XKN assertion.
• 80%25%20of%20the%20works%20are%20from%202011%20to%202021%2C%20and%20just%20over%20half%20are%20from%202016%20to%202021. obtainsSupportFrom j.dib.2022.108319 assertion.
• 80%25%20of%20the%20works%20are%20from%202011%20to%202021%2C%20and%20just%20over%20half%20are%20from%202016%20to%202021. obtainsSupportFrom 2G0XKN assertion.
• 34%20works%20were%20published%20between%201891%20and%201999. obtainsSupportFrom j.dib.2022.108319 assertion.
• 34%20works%20were%20published%20between%201891%20and%201999. obtainsSupportFrom 2G0XKN assertion.
• The%20creative%20works%20are%20from%2059%20different%20countries%2C%20with%2078.6%25%20from%20North%20America%20and%20Europe%2C%20and%2021.4%25%20from%20other%20parts%20of%20the%20world. obtainsSupportFrom j.dib.2022.108319 assertion.
• The%20creative%20works%20are%20from%2059%20different%20countries%2C%20with%2078.6%25%20from%20North%20America%20and%20Europe%2C%20and%2021.4%25%20from%20other%20parts%20of%20the%20world. obtainsSupportFrom 2G0XKN assertion.
• In%20the%20dataset%2C%20narratives%20are%20more%20heavily%20biased%20towards%20English-speaking%20countries%2C%20while%20artworks%20and%20games%20are%20more%20evenly%20spread. obtainsSupportFrom j.dib.2022.108319 assertion.
• In%20the%20dataset%2C%20narratives%20are%20more%20heavily%20biased%20towards%20English-speaking%20countries%2C%20while%20artworks%20and%20games%20are%20more%20evenly%20spread. obtainsSupportFrom 2G0XKN assertion.
• The%20dataset%20identified%20874%20specific%20situations%20where%20machine%20vision%20is%20central%20in%20the%20creative%20works. obtainsSupportFrom j.dib.2022.108319 assertion.
• The%20dataset%20identified%20874%20specific%20situations%20where%20machine%20vision%20is%20central%20in%20the%20creative%20works. obtainsSupportFrom 2G0XKN assertion.
• The%20dataset%20includes%20778%20characters%20that%20interact%20with%20machine%20vision%20technologies%20in%20the%20creative%20works. obtainsSupportFrom j.dib.2022.108319 assertion.
• The%20dataset%20includes%20778%20characters%20that%20interact%20with%20machine%20vision%20technologies%20in%20the%20creative%20works. obtainsSupportFrom 2G0XKN assertion.
• Group%20characters%2C%20such%20as%20the%20Gamemasters%20in%20The%20Hunger%20Games%2C%20account%20for%2090%20of%20the%20total%20characters. obtainsSupportFrom j.dib.2022.108319 assertion.
• Group%20characters%2C%20such%20as%20the%20Gamemasters%20in%20The%20Hunger%20Games%2C%20account%20for%2090%20of%20the%20total%20characters. obtainsSupportFrom 2G0XKN assertion.
• The%20majority%20of%20works%20%28464%20from%20the%20total%20500%29%20were%20published%20in%202000%20or%20later. obtainsSupportFrom j.dib.2022.108319 assertion.
• The%20majority%20of%20works%20%28464%20from%20the%20total%20500%29%20were%20published%20in%202000%20or%20later. obtainsSupportFrom 2G0XKN assertion.
• The%20exploratory%20factor%20analyses%20displayed%20the%20same%20number%20of%20extracted%20factors%20as%20the%20number%20of%20subscales%20in%20each%20of%20the%20original%20American%20questionnaires. obtainsSupportFrom j.ijnsa.2020.100012 assertion.
• The%20exploratory%20factor%20analyses%20displayed%20the%20same%20number%20of%20extracted%20factors%20as%20the%20number%20of%20subscales%20in%20each%20of%20the%20original%20American%20questionnaires. obtainsSupportFrom USN.12383978 assertion.
• The%20item-factor%20structure%20differed%20from%20the%20original%20item-subscales. obtainsSupportFrom j.ijnsa.2020.100012 assertion.
• The%20item-factor%20structure%20differed%20from%20the%20original%20item-subscales. obtainsSupportFrom USN.12383978 assertion.
• The%20Cronbach%E2%80%99s%20alpha%20was%20greater%20than%200.7%20for%20all%20three%20questionnaires%2C%20indicating%20acceptable%20internal%20consistency. obtainsSupportFrom j.ijnsa.2020.100012 assertion.
• The%20Cronbach%E2%80%99s%20alpha%20was%20greater%20than%200.7%20for%20all%20three%20questionnaires%2C%20indicating%20acceptable%20internal%20consistency. obtainsSupportFrom USN.12383978 assertion.
• For%20the%20Simulation%20Design%20Scale%20%28SDS%29%2C%20the%20item-total%20correlations%20were%20above%200.30%20except%20for%20items%20D19%20and%20D20%20in%20SDS-PO%20and%20item%20D19%20in%20SDS-IO. obtainsSupportFrom j.ijnsa.2020.100012 assertion.
• For%20the%20Simulation%20Design%20Scale%20%28SDS%29%2C%20the%20item-total%20correlations%20were%20above%200.30%20except%20for%20items%20D19%20and%20D20%20in%20SDS-PO%20and%20item%20D19%20in%20SDS-IO. obtainsSupportFrom USN.12383978 assertion.
• For%20the%20Educational%20Practices%20Questionnaire%20%28EPQ%29%2C%20inter-item%20correlations%20were%20all%20above%200.30%20except%20for%20item%20E3%20in%20EPQ-PO. obtainsSupportFrom j.ijnsa.2020.100012 assertion.
• For%20the%20Educational%20Practices%20Questionnaire%20%28EPQ%29%2C%20inter-item%20correlations%20were%20all%20above%200.30%20except%20for%20item%20E3%20in%20EPQ-PO. obtainsSupportFrom USN.12383978 assertion.
• Item%20S13%20in%20the%20Student%20Satisfaction%20and%20Self-Confidence%20in%20Learning%20Scale%20%28SCLS%29%20was%20removed%20due%20to%20its%20Cronbach%E2%80%99s%20alpha%20being%20higher%20than%20the%20total%20scale%20alpha. obtainsSupportFrom j.ijnsa.2020.100012 assertion.
• Item%20S13%20in%20the%20Student%20Satisfaction%20and%20Self-Confidence%20in%20Learning%20Scale%20%28SCLS%29%20was%20removed%20due%20to%20its%20Cronbach%E2%80%99s%20alpha%20being%20higher%20than%20the%20total%20scale%20alpha. obtainsSupportFrom USN.12383978 assertion.
• The%20two-factor%20solution%20for%20the%20SCLS%20explained%2056.0%25%20of%20the%20variance. obtainsSupportFrom j.ijnsa.2020.100012 assertion.
• The%20two-factor%20solution%20for%20the%20SCLS%20explained%2056.0%25%20of%20the%20variance. obtainsSupportFrom USN.12383978 assertion.
• For%20SDS-PO%20and%20SDS-IO%2C%20the%20five-component%20solutions%20explained%2066.8%25%20and%2069.0%25%20of%20the%20variance%2C%20respectively. obtainsSupportFrom j.ijnsa.2020.100012 assertion.
• For%20SDS-PO%20and%20SDS-IO%2C%20the%20five-component%20solutions%20explained%2066.8%25%20and%2069.0%25%20of%20the%20variance%2C%20respectively. obtainsSupportFrom USN.12383978 assertion.
• For%20EPQ-PO%20and%20EPQ-IO%2C%20the%20four-component%20solutions%20explained%2056.7%25%20and%2062.9%25%20of%20the%20variance%2C%20respectively. obtainsSupportFrom j.ijnsa.2020.100012 assertion.
• For%20EPQ-PO%20and%20EPQ-IO%2C%20the%20four-component%20solutions%20explained%2056.7%25%20and%2062.9%25%20of%20the%20variance%2C%20respectively. obtainsSupportFrom USN.12383978 assertion.
• The%20mean%20and%20median%20buffer%20widths%20were%207.0%20m%20and%205.7%20m%2C%20respectively. obtainsSupportFrom j.tfp.2025.101069 assertion.
• The%20mean%20and%20median%20buffer%20widths%20were%207.0%20m%20and%205.7%20m%2C%20respectively. obtainsSupportFrom KXJCJF assertion.
• Eighty-five%20percent%20of%20the%20buffers%20were%20narrower%20than%20the%20prescribed%20standard%20width%20of%20minimum%2010%20m. obtainsSupportFrom j.tfp.2025.101069 assertion.
• Eighty-five%20percent%20of%20the%20buffers%20were%20narrower%20than%20the%20prescribed%20standard%20width%20of%20minimum%2010%20m. obtainsSupportFrom KXJCJF assertion.
• Forty-six%20percent%20of%20the%20stands%20still%20met%20certification%20requirements%20due%20to%20exemptions%20allowing%20reduced%20buffer%20widths. obtainsSupportFrom j.tfp.2025.101069 assertion.
• Forty-six%20percent%20of%20the%20stands%20still%20met%20certification%20requirements%20due%20to%20exemptions%20allowing%20reduced%20buffer%20widths. obtainsSupportFrom KXJCJF assertion.
• Harvested%20trees%20had%20a%20greater%20mean%20diameter%20at%20root%20collar%20%2830.6%20cm%29%20than%20the%20non-harvested%20trees%20%2812.3%20cm%29. obtainsSupportFrom j.tfp.2025.101069 assertion.
• Harvested%20trees%20had%20a%20greater%20mean%20diameter%20at%20root%20collar%20%2830.6%20cm%29%20than%20the%20non-harvested%20trees%20%2812.3%20cm%29. obtainsSupportFrom KXJCJF assertion.
• The%20mean%20tree%20volume%20in%20the%20group%20of%20harvested%20trees%20was%200.4%20m%C2%B3%2C%20while%20the%20mean%20tree%20volume%20in%20the%20group%20of%20non-harvested%20trees%20was%200.1%20m%C2%B3. obtainsSupportFrom j.tfp.2025.101069 assertion.
• The%20mean%20tree%20volume%20in%20the%20group%20of%20harvested%20trees%20was%200.4%20m%C2%B3%2C%20while%20the%20mean%20tree%20volume%20in%20the%20group%20of%20non-harvested%20trees%20was%200.1%20m%C2%B3. obtainsSupportFrom KXJCJF assertion.
• The%20mean%20root%20collar%20diameter%20for%20living%20trees%20was%20reduced%20post-harvest%20%2811.8%20cm%29%20compared%20to%20pre-harvest%20%2815.8%20cm%29. obtainsSupportFrom j.tfp.2025.101069 assertion.
• The%20mean%20root%20collar%20diameter%20for%20living%20trees%20was%20reduced%20post-harvest%20%2811.8%20cm%29%20compared%20to%20pre-harvest%20%2815.8%20cm%29. obtainsSupportFrom KXJCJF assertion.
• No%20site%20characteristics%20could%20explain%20the%20narrow%20buffers. obtainsSupportFrom j.tfp.2025.101069 assertion.
• No%20site%20characteristics%20could%20explain%20the%20narrow%20buffers. obtainsSupportFrom KXJCJF assertion.
• Fifty-four%20percent%20of%20the%20stands%20were%20non-compliant%20with%20PEFC%20requirements. obtainsSupportFrom j.tfp.2025.101069 assertion.
• Fifty-four%20percent%20of%20the%20stands%20were%20non-compliant%20with%20PEFC%20requirements. obtainsSupportFrom KXJCJF assertion.
• Narrow%20buffers%20%28%3C%205.0%20m%29%20showed%20no%20significant%20differences%20in%20pre-harvest%20tree%20diameter%20variation%20%28Gini%20coefficient%29%20compared%20to%20wider%20buffers%20%28%E2%89%A5%205%20m%29. obtainsSupportFrom j.tfp.2025.101069 assertion.
• Narrow%20buffers%20%28%3C%205.0%20m%29%20showed%20no%20significant%20differences%20in%20pre-harvest%20tree%20diameter%20variation%20%28Gini%20coefficient%29%20compared%20to%20wider%20buffers%20%28%E2%89%A5%205%20m%29. obtainsSupportFrom KXJCJF assertion.
• Mean%20buffer%20widths%20in%20stands%20next%20to%20lakes%2C%20rivers%2C%20and%20streams%20were%2011.4%20m%2C%206.9%20m%2C%20and%203.7%20m%2C%20respectively%2C%20being%20significantly%20different. obtainsSupportFrom j.tfp.2025.101069 assertion.
• Mean%20buffer%20widths%20in%20stands%20next%20to%20lakes%2C%20rivers%2C%20and%20streams%20were%2011.4%20m%2C%206.9%20m%2C%20and%203.7%20m%2C%20respectively%2C%20being%20significantly%20different. obtainsSupportFrom KXJCJF assertion.
• The%20mean%20buffer%20width%20was%208.3%20m%20in%20Bilberry%20woodland%2C%206.9%20m%20in%20Lingonberry-bilberry%20woodland%2C%20and%201.5%20m%20in%20Low-herb%20woodland%2C%20with%20significant%20differences%20between%20vegetation%20types. obtainsSupportFrom j.tfp.2025.101069 assertion.
• The%20mean%20buffer%20width%20was%208.3%20m%20in%20Bilberry%20woodland%2C%206.9%20m%20in%20Lingonberry-bilberry%20woodland%2C%20and%201.5%20m%20in%20Low-herb%20woodland%2C%20with%20significant%20differences%20between%20vegetation%20types. obtainsSupportFrom KXJCJF assertion.
• There%20was%20a%20weak%2C%20significant%2C%20negative%20relationship%20between%20pre-harvest%20Gini%20coefficient%20for%20all%20trees%20and%20buffer%20width. obtainsSupportFrom j.tfp.2025.101069 assertion.
• There%20was%20a%20weak%2C%20significant%2C%20negative%20relationship%20between%20pre-harvest%20Gini%20coefficient%20for%20all%20trees%20and%20buffer%20width. obtainsSupportFrom KXJCJF assertion.
• The%20difference%20in%20the%20occurrence%20of%20driving%20in%20the%20riparian%20buffer%20between%20Good%20and%20Substandard%20practice%20groups%20was%20significant. obtainsSupportFrom j.tfp.2025.101069 assertion.
• The%20difference%20in%20the%20occurrence%20of%20driving%20in%20the%20riparian%20buffer%20between%20Good%20and%20Substandard%20practice%20groups%20was%20significant. obtainsSupportFrom KXJCJF assertion.
• The%20removal%20of%20broadleaved%20trees%20was%20significantly%20more%20frequent%20in%20the%20Substandard%20practice%20group. obtainsSupportFrom j.tfp.2025.101069 assertion.
• The%20removal%20of%20broadleaved%20trees%20was%20significantly%20more%20frequent%20in%20the%20Substandard%20practice%20group. obtainsSupportFrom KXJCJF assertion.
• The%20number%20of%20harvested%20stumps%20per%20hectare%20was%20significantly%20higher%20in%20the%20Substandard%20practice%20group. obtainsSupportFrom j.tfp.2025.101069 assertion.
• The%20number%20of%20harvested%20stumps%20per%20hectare%20was%20significantly%20higher%20in%20the%20Substandard%20practice%20group. obtainsSupportFrom KXJCJF assertion.
• Only%2042%25%20of%20the%20inspected%20riparian%20forest%20buffers%20fully%20adhered%20to%20the%20certification%20standards%20for%20forest%20management. obtainsSupportFrom j.tfp.2025.101069 assertion.
• Only%2042%25%20of%20the%20inspected%20riparian%20forest%20buffers%20fully%20adhered%20to%20the%20certification%20standards%20for%20forest%20management. obtainsSupportFrom KXJCJF assertion.
• Adherence%20to%20certification%20standards%20was%20significantly%20lower%20in%20privately%20owned%20forests%20%2835%25%29%20compared%20to%20publicly%20owned%20forests%20%2861%25%29. obtainsSupportFrom j.tfp.2025.101069 assertion.
• Adherence%20to%20certification%20standards%20was%20significantly%20lower%20in%20privately%20owned%20forests%20%2835%25%29%20compared%20to%20publicly%20owned%20forests%20%2861%25%29. obtainsSupportFrom KXJCJF assertion.
• Buffers%20along%20streams%20classified%20as%20%27small%27%20%28width%20%3C%205m%29%20had%2028%25%20adherence%20to%20certification%20standards%2C%20compared%20to%2056%25%20adherence%20for%20%27large%27%20streams%20%28width%20%3E%2020m%29. obtainsSupportFrom j.tfp.2025.101069 assertion.
• Buffers%20along%20streams%20classified%20as%20%27small%27%20%28width%20%3C%205m%29%20had%2028%25%20adherence%20to%20certification%20standards%2C%20compared%20to%2056%25%20adherence%20for%20%27large%27%20streams%20%28width%20%3E%2020m%29. obtainsSupportFrom KXJCJF assertion.
• Forested%20buffers%20wider%20than%2030%20meters%20showed%20a%2078%25%20adherence%20rate%20to%20certification%20standards%2C%20while%20buffers%20narrower%20than%2010%20meters%20showed%20only%2019%25%20adherence. obtainsSupportFrom j.tfp.2025.101069 assertion.
• Forested%20buffers%20wider%20than%2030%20meters%20showed%20a%2078%25%20adherence%20rate%20to%20certification%20standards%2C%20while%20buffers%20narrower%20than%2010%20meters%20showed%20only%2019%25%20adherence. obtainsSupportFrom KXJCJF assertion.
• Regions%20with%20higher%20average%20rainfall%20exhibited%20lower%20adherence%20to%20riparian%20buffer%20standards%20%2833%25%29%20than%20drier%20regions%20%2852%25%29. obtainsSupportFrom j.tfp.2025.101069 assertion.
• Regions%20with%20higher%20average%20rainfall%20exhibited%20lower%20adherence%20to%20riparian%20buffer%20standards%20%2833%25%29%20than%20drier%20regions%20%2852%25%29. obtainsSupportFrom KXJCJF assertion.
• Our%20survey%20of%20linguistic%20journals%20reveals%20that%205-point%20and%207-point%20response%20scales%20are%20the%20most%20common%20formats%2C%20with%2037%25%20and%2027%25%20prevalence%20respectively. obtainsSupportFrom j.rmal.2024.100156 assertion.
• Our%20survey%20of%20linguistic%20journals%20reveals%20that%205-point%20and%207-point%20response%20scales%20are%20the%20most%20common%20formats%2C%20with%2037%25%20and%2027%25%20prevalence%20respectively. obtainsSupportFrom B3NJBT assertion.
• In%2049%25%20of%20cases%2C%20only%20the%20endpoints%20of%20ordinal%20response%20scales%20are%20labeled%2C%20while%2042%25%20use%20fully%20labeled%20scales. obtainsSupportFrom j.rmal.2024.100156 assertion.
• In%2049%25%20of%20cases%2C%20only%20the%20endpoints%20of%20ordinal%20response%20scales%20are%20labeled%2C%20while%2042%25%20use%20fully%20labeled%20scales. obtainsSupportFrom B3NJBT assertion.

• first
• previous
• next