Matches in Nanopublications for { ?s <http://purl.org/dc/terms/description> ?o ?g. }
- get-latest-accepted description "This query returns the latest nanopublications accepted at a journal, currently covering RIO, Biodiversity Data Journal, and Data Science." assertion.
- get-top-authors description "This query returns the 10 authors with the most nanopublications accepted in journals." assertion.
- get-publisher-version-at-bdj-journal description "This query returns the final publisher version of the given nanopublication, or an empty result if no such version is found." assertion.
- get-publisher-version-at-bdj-journal description "This query returns the final publisher version of the given nanopublication, or an empty result if no such version is found." assertion.
- get-publisher-version-at-bdj-journal description "This query returns the final publisher version of the given nanopublication, or an empty result if no such version is found." assertion.
- get-publisher-version description "This query returns the final publisher version of the given nanopublication, or an empty result if no such version is found." assertion.
- get-publisher-version description "This query returns the final publisher version of the given nanopublication, or an empty result if no such version is found." assertion.
- get-head-np-info description "This query returns some basic info - creator, author, label, etc. - on the head version of a nanopublication, i.e. the user-generated original version or - if available - a publisher-accepted version at a journal." assertion.
- get-head-np-info description "This query returns some basic info - creator, author, label, etc. - on the head version of a nanopublication, i.e. the user-generated original version or - if available - a publisher-accepted version at a journal." assertion.
- get-head-np-info description "This query returns some basic info - creator, author, label, etc. - on the head version of a nanopublication, i.e. the user-generated original version or - if available - a publisher-accepted version at a journal." assertion.
- get-head-np-info description "This query returns some basic info - creator, author, label, etc. - on the head version of a nanopublication, i.e. the user-generated original version or - if available - a publisher-accepted version at a journal." assertion.
- get-biodiv-nanopubs description "This query returns all biodiversity-relation nanopublications." assertion.
- get-biodiv-nanopubs description "This query returns all biodiversity-relation nanopublications." assertion.
- get-nanopubs-for-paper description "This query returns all the nanopublications that user the Open Annotation Model to annotate a given paper (by DOI, for example)." assertion.
- get-nanopubs-for-paper description "This query returns all the nanopublications that user the Open Annotation Model to annotate a given paper (by DOI, for example)." assertion.
- get-nanopubs-for-paper description "This query returns all the nanopublications that refer to (e.g. annotate) a given paper." assertion.
- get-reactions description "This query returns all the reactions modeled with CiTO and published as nanopublications that refer to a given paper (e.g. by DOI) or other nanopublication." assertion.
- get-reactions description "This query returns all the reactions modeled with CiTO and published as nanopublications that refer to a given paper (e.g. by DOI) or other nanopublication." assertion.
- get-publisher-version description "This query returns the final publisher version of the given nanopublication, or an empty result if no such version is found." assertion.
- get-accepted-nanopubs-by-author description "This query returns all nanopublications accepted at a journal by the given author." assertion.
- fip description "FAIR-SaaS" assertion.
- fip description "FAIR-SaaS" assertion.
- fip description "FAIR-SaaS" assertion.
- RAHpaF8VoVn8R-bu9jcpn4bzBcVv-cNvBMsxdAjG6FjPw description "--- title: "[[EVD]] - example published evd - [[@someSource]]" url: https://roamresearch.com/#/app/roamjs-dev/page/pfW74_4-F author: Michael Gartner date: Tue Sep 03 2024 09:30:55 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time) --- - # header 1 - child - **bold** - block ref: 5jrU5Hxqq " assertion.
- RAbOIPk-0AGW7vJn9Je039cYK1wDaWFp_aJGq5cuAph18 description "--- title: "[[EVD]] - example published evd - [[@someSource]]" url: https://roamresearch.com/#/app/roamjs-dev/page/pfW74_4-F author: Michael Gartner date: Tue Sep 03 2024 09:30:55 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time) --- - # header 1 - child - **bold** - block ref: 5jrU5Hxqq " assertion.
- RAdgdbWomoZIJMH8XQpjr52RfNSLxiS8AAvdan6l4REOg description "--- title: "[[EVD]] - example published evd - [[@someSource]]" url: https://roamresearch.com/#/app/roamjs-dev/page/pfW74_4-F author: Michael Gartner date: Tue Sep 03 2024 09:30:55 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time) --- - # header 1 - child - **bold** - block ref: 5jrU5Hxqq " assertion.
- RAem5bf_x7mbNQ_1WM1AxDXc9zpQIWINBy7rqLxUjgp8k description "--- title: "[[EVD]] - example published evd - [[@someSource]]" url: https://roamresearch.com/#/app/roamjs-dev/page/pfW74_4-F author: Michael Gartner date: Tue Sep 03 2024 09:30:55 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time) --- - # header 1 - child - **bold** - block ref: 5jrU5Hxqq " assertion.
- RAjEiNedtTdn6raa7RIJngj_PhExNf2p3SJnuv66-xSIk description "--- title: "[[EVD]] - example published evd - [[@someSource]]" url: https://roamresearch.com/#/app/roamjs-dev/page/pfW74_4-F author: Michael Gartner date: Tue Sep 03 2024 09:30:55 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time) --- - # header 1 - child - **bold** - block ref: 5jrU5Hxqq " assertion.
- fip description "FAIR-SaaS" assertion.
- Variable27 description "Mass concentration of isobutylene in chloroform." assertion.
- variable16 description "The measure of an ectotherm animal's baseline metabolic rate (i.e. non-active, non-stressed) measured by the milligrams of oxygen consumed in a period of time of one hour." assertion.
- variable1 description "Density (particle per cm3) of electrons measured in the Solar Wind." assertion.
- fip description "eLTER FIP 2022: This is the FIP for the eLTER Community representing the choices made in 2022." assertion.
- variable2 description "Temperature of the air in a height of 1.7 meter, daily maximum" assertion.
- Variable6 description "In accordance with common usage in geophysical disciplines, "flux" implies per unit area, called "flux density" in physics. "Vegetation" means any living plants e.g. trees, shrubs, grass. The specification of a physical process by the phrase "due_to_" process means that the quantity named is a single term in a sum of terms which together compose the general quantity named by omitting the phrase. The term "senescence" means loss of living biomass excluding plant death, e.g. leaf drop and other seasonal effects. The term refers to changes in the whole plant and is not confined only to leaf drop." assertion.
- variable7 description "Trunk char height is a measure of the extent of fire height above ground which is measured from the base to the highest point of fire occurrence on the tree trunk. Maximum char height is measured at the community level using a 360° sweep at each sampling location." assertion.
- Variable8 description "CWD abundance per hectare (m2/hectare) is the abundance of CWD measured from all the plots/transects scaled to a hectare (100 x 100 m). They are calculated using the formula (see https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037811270900783X)" assertion.
- assertion description "This template allows for describing the benchmark procedure and other metadata of benchmarks performed with RiverBench tasks and datasets. Please refer to RiverBench profiles and tasks using their permanent URLs (PURLs) with a specified version (not dev!). For example: https://w3id.org/riverbench/v/2.0.1/profiles/flat-mixed https://w3id.org/riverbench/v/2.0.1/tasks/flat-compression In the benchmark metrics field, use the names of the metrics specified in the task definition that you have used. If possible, link to the paper that reported this benchmark using the "cites as data source" field. This way, a citation of this paper will appear on RiverBench's website." assertion.
- variable4 description "Identification of height-range above valley floor influenced by boundary layer air/free troposphere." assertion.
- lookup-fdo-types description "This query is for auto-complete lookup of FDO types." assertion.
- get-all-nanopubs-last30d description "This query returns all the nanopublications created in the last 30 days, sorted by recency." assertion.
- Variable10 description "Peak acceleration measured on the earth surface when facing seismic events, like earthquakes." assertion.
- get-most-used-templates-last30d description "This query returns the most used assertion templates of the last 30 days, considering the latest versions of these templates." assertion.
- variable15 description "Size of planktic foraminifers in surface sediments, see https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.126730" assertion.
- Variable22 description "Smoking status current of a patient" assertion.
- variable17 description "The amount of docosahexaenoic acid relative to dry weight in an individual." assertion.
- variable14 description "The total area (in ha) of feral-free enclosures." assertion.
- get-fdos description "This query returns a list of FDOs, possibly restricted by type of search term." assertion.
- get-fdos description "This query returns a list of FDOs, possibly restricted by type of search term." assertion.
- IsobutyleneConcentration description "The mass of isobutylene divided by the volume of the mixture of isobutylene and chloroform, expressed as mass per unit volume." assertion.
- assertion description "Such a nanopublication defines a new FDO type to be used to classify FAIR Digital Objects (FDOs)." assertion.
- assertion description "Such a nanopublication defines a new FDO type to be used to classify FAIR Digital Objects (FDOs)." assertion.
- assertion description "Such a nanopublication defines a new FDO type to be used to classify FAIR Digital Objects (FDOs)." assertion.
- kim-min-hee description "a korean person" assertion.
- assertion description "Template for defining a FAIR specification for the following subtypes: metadata schema, metadata-data linking schema, communication protocol, knowledge representation language, structured vocabulary, semantic model and provenance model." assertion.
- assertion description "Template for defining a FAIR specification for the following subtypes: metadata schema, metadata-data linking schema, communication protocol, knowledge representation language, structured vocabulary, semantic model and provenance model." assertion.
- assertion description "Template for defining a FAIR specification for the following subtypes: metadata schema, metadata-data linking schema, communication protocol, knowledge representation language, structured vocabulary, semantic model and provenance model." assertion.
- assertion description "Template for defining a FAIR specification for the following subtypes: metadata schema, metadata-data linking schema, communication protocol, knowledge representation language, structured vocabulary, semantic model and provenance model." assertion.
- assertion description "Template for defining a FAIR specification for the following subtypes: metadata schema, metadata-data linking schema, communication protocol, knowledge representation language, structured vocabulary, semantic model and provenance model." assertion.
- assertion description "Template for defining a FAIR specification for the following subtypes: metadata schema, metadata-data linking schema, communication protocol, knowledge representation language, structured vocabulary, semantic model and provenance model." assertion.
- assertion description "Template for defining a FAIR specification for the following subtypes: metadata schema, metadata-data linking schema, communication protocol, knowledge representation language, structured vocabulary, semantic model and provenance model." assertion.
- assertion description "Template for defining a FAIR specification for the following subtypes: metadata schema, metadata-data linking schema, communication protocol, knowledge representation language, structured vocabulary, semantic model and provenance model." assertion.
- assertion description "Template for defining a FAIR specification for the following subtypes: metadata schema, metadata-data linking schema, communication protocol, knowledge representation language, structured vocabulary, semantic model and provenance model." assertion.
- assertion description "Template to store data required to describe an AOP's KeyEvent following FAIR principles." assertion.
- assertion description "Template to store data required to describe an AOP's KeyEvent following FAIR principles." assertion.
- assertion description "Template to store data required to describe an AOP's KeyEvent following FAIR principles." assertion.
- find-things description "This query performs a full-text search on the things introduced in nanopublications." assertion.
- find-things description "This query performs a full-text search on the things introduced in nanopublications." assertion.
- find-things description "This query performs a full-text search on the labels for the 3PFF events." assertion.
- find-3pff-events description "This query performs a full-text search on the labels for the 3PFF events." assertion.
- assertion description "This nanopublication defines an assertion template. Such templates are used to generate the input form for the (blue) assertion part of nanopublications." assertion.
- Evidence description "<body> <ul> <li>testing markdown</li> <li><h1 id="h1">h1</h1> <ul> <li><strong>bold child</strong></li> </ul> </li> <li>image<ul> <li><img src="https://firebasestorage.googleapis.com/v0/b/firescript-577a2.appspot.com/o/imgs%2Fapp%2Froamjs-dev%2FlZphQDbrTz.jpg?alt=media&token=fa383574-0d1f-40b9-94b4-25e59e76874e" alt=""></li> </ul> </li> </ul> </body>" assertion.
- Evidence description "<body> <ul> <li>testing markdown</li> <li><h1 id="h1">h1</h1> <ul> <li><strong>bold child</strong></li> </ul> </li> <li>image<ul> <li><img src="https://firebasestorage.googleapis.com/v0/b/firescript-577a2.appspot.com/o/imgs%2Fapp%2Froamjs-dev%2FlZphQDbrTz.jpg?alt=media&token=fa383574-0d1f-40b9-94b4-25e59e76874e" alt=""></li> </ul> </li> </ul> </body>" assertion.
- Evidence description "<body> <ul> <li><h2 id="summary">Summary</h2> <ul> <li>estimated semantic networks of animal concepts from montessori-educated children were more interconnected, with shorter paths between concepts and fewer subcommunities, compared to networks from traditional-schooled but comparable children<ul> <li><img src="https://firebasestorage.googleapis.com/v0/b/firescript-577a2.appspot.com/o/imgs%2Fapp%2Fmegacoglab%2F7aHUer0evF.png?alt=media&token=cf1ba046-bf98-4277-ab1f-99363dd9f278" alt=""> (p. 3: Figure 1, Figure 2)</li> </ul> </li> <li><img src="https://firebasestorage.googleapis.com/v0/b/firescript-577a2.appspot.com/o/imgs%2Fapp%2Fmegacoglab%2FAZen14iS-z.png?alt=media&token=dabe714b-1fb9-464e-b312-986ecacecb7b" alt=""><br><img src="https://firebasestorage.googleapis.com/v0/b/firescript-577a2.appspot.com/o/imgs%2Fapp%2Fmegacoglab%2F4ogsqIPX-L.png?alt=media&token=9fa732ba-1fb2-4a01-8687-f5fbfee4ee07" alt=""> (pp. 2-3)</li> </ul> </li> <li><h2 id="grounding-context">Grounding Context</h2> <ul> <li>Who:: compare montessori kids to comparable kids (wrt SES, nonverbal intelligence) from other schooling systems, 67 kids in total<ul> <li><blockquote> <p>A total of 67 children participated in the current study (Mage =9.31, SD=2.23, 47.8% girls) through the University Hospital of Lausanne researchpool as part of a broader research project on education and neurocognitive development. Children were compensated with a ~30 USD gift voucher for completion of the study. Inclusion criteria were schoolings ystem (participants had to be enrolled in Montessori or in traditional classes from the early years on, in the case of the youngest children, or for at least 3 years), age (5-14 years of age); exclusion criteria were parental report of learning disabilities or sensory impairment. To account for variability in our measures due to nonverbal intelligence, or socioeconomic background, we controlled for between-group homogeneity in nonverbal intelligence (black and white short version of the Progressive Matrices®) and family socioeconomic status (both parents’ education levels (score from 1 to 5) and current job (score from 1 to 4); scores were summed and averaged between both parents (max 9), with higher scores denoting higher SES). (p. 4)</p> </blockquote> </li> <li><img src="https://firebasestorage.googleapis.com/v0/b/firescript-577a2.appspot.com/o/imgs%2Fapp%2Fmegacoglab%2FrycDCyaRtc.png?alt=media&token=445952fa-ab39-4e1d-a73d-c69bcead5233" alt=""><br><img src="https://firebasestorage.googleapis.com/v0/b/firescript-577a2.appspot.com/o/imgs%2Fapp%2Fmegacoglab%2FKwSV1sEwC_.png?alt=media&token=ab464c01-2a06-4666-8096-791b9b21324c" alt=""><br>(p. 4)</li> <li><img src="https://firebasestorage.googleapis.com/v0/b/firescript-577a2.appspot.com/o/imgs%2Fapp%2Fmegacoglab%2FzboND2S8yj.png?alt=media&token=39ce2fe6-cb89-457f-9497-2231e700e1c9" alt=""> (p. 2, Table 1)</li> </ul> </li> <li>How:: procedures: do verbal fluency task (name as many animals in 60s), and creativity assessment (standard tasks from Evaluation of Potential Creativity)<ul> <li><blockquote> <p>Children completed verbal fluency task. Category verbal fluency tasks have been widely used to efficiently assess semantic network organization. Consistent with traditional task administration, each child had 60s to name as many animals as he/she could. Based on previous work in children, we targeted the animal category. Children spoke their responses out loud, which were recorded (and later transcribed) by an experimenter. For each child, fluency data was preprocessed using the SemNA pipeline in R. Repetitions or variation on roots were converged and non-category members were excluded from the final analysis. Number of responses per participant were summed (total number of responses). (p. 5)</p> </blockquote> </li> <li><img src="https://firebasestorage.googleapis.com/v0/b/firescript-577a2.appspot.com/o/imgs%2Fapp%2Fmegacoglab%2FN0IkB6RHUK.png?alt=media&token=923be4ff-bb03-42b4-b72e-ab0dc7c93e39" alt=""> (p. 5)</li> <li><blockquote> <p>To assess creative thinking, children completed divergent and convergent creativity tasks from the Evaluation of Potential Creativity. Divergent thinking reflects the ability to think of ideas that differ from one another; convergent thinking reflects the ability to think of a single creative solution. Performance on such creative thinking tasks has been shown to predict both academic*' and creative achievement. In the divergent thinking task, the child was asked to draw as many different drawings as possible from one imposed abstract form (i.e, incomplete shape), within 10 min. The final score was the sum of all valid drawings. In the convergent thinking task, the child had to select three different abstract forms out of eight to create an original drawing that combined them, within 15 min. Three blind judges scored the drawings for originality following the EPoC scoring manual (inter-rater agreement; Krippendorff's alpha = 0.905). Independent t tests were computed on each creativity score (divergent and convergent) to test for between-group differences. Pearson’s correlations were computed between each creativity score and the verbal fluency metrics to test whether creative thinking relates to the quantity and quality of words retrieved from semantic memory. (p. 5)</p> </blockquote> </li> <li><img src="https://firebasestorage.googleapis.com/v0/b/firescript-577a2.appspot.com/o/imgs%2Fapp%2Fmegacoglab%2FDnE4cskRkd.png?alt=media&token=22263a5d-7b20-4e30-9c1f-91477edb7892" alt=""> (p. 5)</li> </ul> </li> <li>What:: measures: clustering coefficient, average shortest path length (ASPL) and modularity (Q) of estimated filtered semantic networks of the animal names from the kids<ul> <li>network construction/estimation<ul> <li>dump all responses into a participant-word matrix, so each word is a column, and each participant is a row, and each cell is 0/1 depending on whether participant mentioned the word. this is kind of like a word-document matrix. equate number of nodes across groups<ul> <li><blockquote> <p>The processed data were transferred into a binary response matrix, where columns represent the unique exemplars given by the sample and rows represent participants; the response matrix is filled out by 1 (if an exemplar was generated by that participant) and 0 (if that exemplar was not generated). To control for confounding factors (such as different nodes or edges in both groups), as in previous studies, the binary response matrices only include responses that are given by at least two participants in each group. Then, to avoid the two groups including a different number of nodes, which may bias comparison of network parameters, responses in the binary matrices were equated, so that the networks of both groups in each sample are compared using the same nodes. (p. 5)</p> </blockquote> </li> <li><img src="https://firebasestorage.googleapis.com/v0/b/firescript-577a2.appspot.com/o/imgs%2Fapp%2Fmegacoglab%2F0oToYzqv9m.png?alt=media&token=13a38aa2-7bcf-4437-80ee-6d17b7847fe4" alt=""><br><img src="https://firebasestorage.googleapis.com/v0/b/firescript-577a2.appspot.com/o/imgs%2Fapp%2Fmegacoglab%2FVVRiPfyuXv.png?alt=media&token=b5e316f7-ed9d-4b56-8325-916407d9a691" alt=""> (p. 5)</li> </ul> </li> <li>then for each pair, look at the two "participant vectors" (i.e., the column of 1s and 0s of occurrences across participants)<ul> <li><blockquote> <p>Next, we computed a word association matrix for each group using the cosine similarity. The cosine similarity is commonly used in related to Pearson’s correlation, which can be considered as the cosine between two normalized vectors. With the cosine similarity measure, all values are positive ranging from 0 (two responses do not co-occur) to 1 (two responses always co-occur). For both groups, each element in the word association matrix, A;, represents the cosine similarity or the co-occurrence between response i and j. (p. 5)</p> </blockquote> </li> <li><img src="https://firebasestorage.googleapis.com/v0/b/firescript-577a2.appspot.com/o/imgs%2Fapp%2Fmegacoglab%2FsZwDPGqwwj.png?alt=media&token=b1945d69-2503-44a6-8312-50be0384ebf7" alt=""> (p. 5)</li> </ul> </li> <li>then draw a filtered network from the similarity matrix using [[mTriangulated Maximally Filtered Graph (TMFG)]]<ul> <li><blockquote> <p>Finally, using these word association matrices, we applied the triangulated maximally filtered graph TMFGY; to minimize noise and potential spurious associations. The TMFG method filters the word association matrices to capture only the most relevant information (i.e, removal of spurious associations and retaining the largest associations) within the original network. This approach retains the same number of edges between groups (i.e, 3n-6, where n equals the number of responses), which avoids the confound of difference network structures being due to a different number of edges, This resulted in a 68 nodes network with 198 edges for both groups. (p. 5)</p> </blockquote> </li> <li><img src="https://firebasestorage.googleapis.com/v0/b/firescript-577a2.appspot.com/o/imgs%2Fapp%2Fmegacoglab%2FAjRpsnRRvW.png?alt=media&token=c04e35a2-f0aa-4356-99a6-39d29c03a0a1" alt=""> (p. 5)</li> <li>method is from [[massaraNetworkFilteringBig2017]]</li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> <li>network metrics: clustering coefficient, average shortest path length (ASPL) and modularity (Q)<ul> <li><img src="https://firebasestorage.googleapis.com/v0/b/firescript-577a2.appspot.com/o/imgs%2Fapp%2Fmegacoglab%2Fk3I3R5wz7m.png?alt=media&token=23dc3f85-456e-46f0-b403-c57ccc02b58f" alt=""><ul> <li>The SemNA pipeline in R was used to compute the CC, ASPL, and Q measures for both groups. Clustering Coefficient (CC) refers to the extent that neighbors of anode will themselves be neighbors (i.e., a neighbor is a node i that is connected through an edge to node j). Higher clustering coefficient indicates a more interconnected semantic network,Average Shortest Path Length (ASPL) refers to the average shortest number of steps (i.e,, edges) needed to traverse between any pair of nodes; the higher the ASPL, the more spread out a network is. Previous research has shown that the ASPL in semantic networks corresponds to participants’ judgments as to whether two concepts are related to each other’*. Modularity (Q) estimates how a network breaks apart (or partitions) into smaller sub-networks or communities. Q measures the extent to which the network has dense connections between nodes within a community and sparse (or few) connections between nodes indifferent communities. Thus, the higher Q, the more the network breaks apart to subcommunities. Such subcommunities can bethought of as subcategories in a semantic network (e.g, farm animals in the “animals” category). Previous research has shown that modularity in semantic networks is inversely related to a network's flexibility. (p. 5)</li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> <li>network estimation sampling for each group: estimate 1000 case-wise bootstrapped simulated networks from each group (basically, for each group, for 1000 times, grab N-M participants from the group, <a href="((E5BAJ-R3Q))">construct the network</a>, and then compute the <a href="((Z37PYNsQe))">network metrics</a>)</li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> </ul> <hr> <ul> <li>[[ACL Recontextualizing Claims and Evidence Shared Task]]<ul> <li>Status:: #resultGrounded #methodsGrounded</li> <li>Annotator:: [[Joel Chan]]</li> <li>ResultGrounding:: [[figure]]</li> </ul> </li> </ul> </body>" assertion.
- assertion description "Template for defining a FAIR specification for the following subtypes: metadata schema, metadata-data linking schema, communication protocol, knowledge representation language, structured vocabulary, semantic model and provenance model." assertion.
- assertion description "Template for defining a FAIR specification for the following subtypes: metadata schema, metadata-data linking schema, communication protocol, knowledge representation language, structured vocabulary, semantic model and provenance model." assertion.
- assertion description "Template for defining an identifier service." assertion.
- assertion description "Template for defining a crosswalk." assertion.
- assertion description "Template for defining an authentication and authorization service." assertion.
- assertion description "Template for defining a registry of digital objects." assertion.
- assertion description "Template for defining an editor service." assertion.
- assertion description "Template for defining a validation service." assertion.
- assertion description "Template for defining a FAIR practice" assertion.
- assertion description "Template for defining an authentication and authorization service." assertion.
- assertion description "Template for defining a validation service." assertion.
- assertion description "Template for defining an editor service." assertion.
- assertion description "Template for defining a crosswalk." assertion.
- assertion description "Template for defining a registry of digital objects." assertion.
- assertion description "Template for defining a FAIR specification for the following subtypes: metadata schema, metadata-data linking schema, communication protocol, knowledge representation language, structured vocabulary, semantic model and provenance model." assertion.
- assertion description "Template for defining an identifier service." assertion.
- assertion description "Template for defining an identifier service." assertion.
- assertion description "Template for defining a FAIR specification for the following subtypes: metadata schema, metadata-data linking schema, communication protocol, knowledge representation language, structured vocabulary, semantic model and provenance model." assertion.
- assertion description "Template for defining a registry of digital objects." assertion.
- assertion description "Template for defining a crosswalk." assertion.
- assertion description "Template for defining an editor service." assertion.
- assertion description "Template for defining a validation service." assertion.
- assertion description "Template for defining an authentication and authorization service." assertion.
- assertion description "Template for defining a FAIR practice" assertion.
- assertion description "Such a nanopublication contains the main high-level metadata about a scholarly article, including title, authors, and links to other nanopublications." assertion.
- assertion description "Template for defining a FAIR practice" assertion.
