Nanopublications LDF server

Matches in Nanopublications for { ?s <http://purl.org/spar/cito/obtainsSupportFrom> ?o ?g. }

• Even%20for%20the%20areas%20with%20delamination%2C%20the%20charring%20had%20not%20reached%20the%20glue-line. obtainsSupportFrom j.firesaf.2023.103869 assertion.
• Even%20for%20the%20areas%20with%20delamination%2C%20the%20charring%20had%20not%20reached%20the%20glue-line. obtainsSupportFrom ZIYHH3 assertion.
• The%20maximum%20temperature%20at%2040%20mm%20depth%20was%20164%E2%80%93194%C2%B0C%20around%20120%20min. obtainsSupportFrom j.firesaf.2023.103869 assertion.
• The%20maximum%20temperature%20at%2040%20mm%20depth%20was%20164%E2%80%93194%C2%B0C%20around%20120%20min. obtainsSupportFrom ZIYHH3 assertion.
• The%20temperature%20below%20the%20ceiling%20at%20120%20min%20was%20approximately%20220%C2%B0C%20and%20declining. obtainsSupportFrom j.firesaf.2023.103869 assertion.
• The%20temperature%20below%20the%20ceiling%20at%20120%20min%20was%20approximately%20220%C2%B0C%20and%20declining. obtainsSupportFrom ZIYHH3 assertion.
• From%20the%20point%20when%20the%20ceiling%20was%20ignited%2C%20the%20fire%20dynamics%20changed%20completely%2C%20and%20the%20flames%20spread%20quickly%20across%20the%20ceiling%20and%20wood%20crib. obtainsSupportFrom j.firesaf.2023.103869 assertion.
• From%20the%20point%20when%20the%20ceiling%20was%20ignited%2C%20the%20fire%20dynamics%20changed%20completely%2C%20and%20the%20flames%20spread%20quickly%20across%20the%20ceiling%20and%20wood%20crib. obtainsSupportFrom ZIYHH3 assertion.
• The%20fire%20travelled%20back%20and%20forth%20in%20four%20distinct%20flashing%20waves%20within%2013%20min. obtainsSupportFrom j.firesaf.2023.103869 assertion.
• The%20fire%20travelled%20back%20and%20forth%20in%20four%20distinct%20flashing%20waves%20within%2013%20min. obtainsSupportFrom ZIYHH3 assertion.
• After%20a%20short%20post-flashover%20phase%2C%20the%20intensity%20of%20the%20fire%20was%20rapidly%20reduced%2C%20and%20the%20CLT%20ceiling%20self-extinguished%20over%20a%20period%20of%20approx.%2010%20min. obtainsSupportFrom j.firesaf.2023.103869 assertion.
• After%20a%20short%20post-flashover%20phase%2C%20the%20intensity%20of%20the%20fire%20was%20rapidly%20reduced%2C%20and%20the%20CLT%20ceiling%20self-extinguished%20over%20a%20period%20of%20approx.%2010%20min. obtainsSupportFrom ZIYHH3 assertion.
• The%20charring%20was%20most%20pronounced%20in%20the%20centre%20of%20the%20ceiling%20and%20towards%20the%20back%20of%20the%20room. obtainsSupportFrom j.firesaf.2023.103869 assertion.
• The%20charring%20was%20most%20pronounced%20in%20the%20centre%20of%20the%20ceiling%20and%20towards%20the%20back%20of%20the%20room. obtainsSupportFrom ZIYHH3 assertion.
• Some%20delamination%20was%20observed%2C%20although%20the%20average%20char%20depth%20did%20not%20reach%20the%20glue%20line. obtainsSupportFrom j.firesaf.2023.103869 assertion.
• Some%20delamination%20was%20observed%2C%20although%20the%20average%20char%20depth%20did%20not%20reach%20the%20glue%20line. obtainsSupportFrom ZIYHH3 assertion.
• No%20reignition%20or%20fire%20growth%20was%20observed%20within%204%20h%20after%20self-extinguishment. obtainsSupportFrom j.firesaf.2023.103869 assertion.
• No%20reignition%20or%20fire%20growth%20was%20observed%20within%204%20h%20after%20self-extinguishment. obtainsSupportFrom ZIYHH3 assertion.
• External%20flames%20were%20present%20during%20the%20flashing%20waves%20and%20for%20a%20short%20period%20after%20flashover. obtainsSupportFrom j.firesaf.2023.103869 assertion.
• External%20flames%20were%20present%20during%20the%20flashing%20waves%20and%20for%20a%20short%20period%20after%20flashover. obtainsSupportFrom ZIYHH3 assertion.
• The%20incident%20heat%20flux%20at%20the%20fa%C3%A7ade%20was%20lower%20than%20the%20highest%20values%20measured%20in%20other%20comparable%20CLT%20compartment%20experiments. obtainsSupportFrom j.firesaf.2023.103869 assertion.
• The%20incident%20heat%20flux%20at%20the%20fa%C3%A7ade%20was%20lower%20than%20the%20highest%20values%20measured%20in%20other%20comparable%20CLT%20compartment%20experiments. obtainsSupportFrom ZIYHH3 assertion.
• The%20fire%20appeared%20neither%20as%20a%20true%20fuel-controlled%20fire%20nor%20a%20ventilation-controlled%20fire%2C%20as%20it%20had%20elements%20of%20both. obtainsSupportFrom j.firesaf.2023.103869 assertion.
• The%20fire%20appeared%20neither%20as%20a%20true%20fuel-controlled%20fire%20nor%20a%20ventilation-controlled%20fire%2C%20as%20it%20had%20elements%20of%20both. obtainsSupportFrom ZIYHH3 assertion.
• The%20fire%20spread%20across%20the%20room%20in%20less%20than%203.5%20minutes%20from%20ignition%20of%20the%20wood%20crib%20on%20the%20floor%20and%20in%201.5%20minutes%20after%20the%20ignition%20of%20the%20ceiling. obtainsSupportFrom j.firesaf.2023.103986 assertion.
• The%20fire%20spread%20across%20the%20room%20in%20less%20than%203.5%20minutes%20from%20ignition%20of%20the%20wood%20crib%20on%20the%20floor%20and%20in%201.5%20minutes%20after%20the%20ignition%20of%20the%20ceiling. obtainsSupportFrom DMJDSD assertion.
• Large%20external%20flames%20were%20observed%2C%20with%20the%20maximum%20height%20reaching%206-8%20meters%20above%20the%20ground. obtainsSupportFrom j.firesaf.2023.103986 assertion.
• Large%20external%20flames%20were%20observed%2C%20with%20the%20maximum%20height%20reaching%206-8%20meters%20above%20the%20ground. obtainsSupportFrom DMJDSD assertion.
• The%205-layer%20CLT%20exhibited%20glue-line%20integrity%20failure%20and%20led%20to%20a%20second%20flashover%20after%20a%20significant%20period%20of%20decay. obtainsSupportFrom j.firesaf.2023.103986 assertion.
• The%205-layer%20CLT%20exhibited%20glue-line%20integrity%20failure%20and%20led%20to%20a%20second%20flashover%20after%20a%20significant%20period%20of%20decay. obtainsSupportFrom DMJDSD assertion.
• Subsequent%20layers%20of%2020%20mm%20also%20delaminated%20before%20the%20fire%20was%20manually%20extinguished%20after%203%20hours. obtainsSupportFrom j.firesaf.2023.103986 assertion.
• Subsequent%20layers%20of%2020%20mm%20also%20delaminated%20before%20the%20fire%20was%20manually%20extinguished%20after%203%20hours. obtainsSupportFrom DMJDSD assertion.
• The%20fire%20spread%20rate%20was%20faster%2C%20and%20temperatures%2C%20charring%20rates%2C%20heat%20release%20rates%2C%20and%20external%20flames%20were%20higher%20in%20%23FRIC-02%20compared%20to%20%23FRIC-01. obtainsSupportFrom j.firesaf.2023.103986 assertion.
• The%20fire%20spread%20rate%20was%20faster%2C%20and%20temperatures%2C%20charring%20rates%2C%20heat%20release%20rates%2C%20and%20external%20flames%20were%20higher%20in%20%23FRIC-02%20compared%20to%20%23FRIC-01. obtainsSupportFrom DMJDSD assertion.
• The%20average%20final%20char%20depth%20across%20the%20CLT%20back%20wall%20was%2097%20mm%20with%20a%20standard%20deviation%20of%2013%20mm%20and%20104%20mm%20with%20a%207%20mm%20standard%20deviation%20for%20the%20CLT%20ceiling. obtainsSupportFrom j.firesaf.2023.103986 assertion.
• The%20average%20final%20char%20depth%20across%20the%20CLT%20back%20wall%20was%2097%20mm%20with%20a%20standard%20deviation%20of%2013%20mm%20and%20104%20mm%20with%20a%207%20mm%20standard%20deviation%20for%20the%20CLT%20ceiling. obtainsSupportFrom DMJDSD assertion.
• The%20charring%20rate%20was%20highest%20for%20the%20first%2010%20mm%20and%20decreased%20with%20each%20subsequent%2010%20mm%20into%20the%20wood. obtainsSupportFrom j.firesaf.2023.103986 assertion.
• The%20charring%20rate%20was%20highest%20for%20the%20first%2010%20mm%20and%20decreased%20with%20each%20subsequent%2010%20mm%20into%20the%20wood. obtainsSupportFrom DMJDSD assertion.
• The%20incident%20heat%20flux%20towards%20the%20facade%20above%20Window%204%20reached%20a%20maximum%20of%20175%20kW%2Fm%C2%B2%20with%20large%20fluctuations%20during%20the%20most%20intense%20phase%20of%20the%20fire. obtainsSupportFrom j.firesaf.2023.103986 assertion.
• The%20incident%20heat%20flux%20towards%20the%20facade%20above%20Window%204%20reached%20a%20maximum%20of%20175%20kW%2Fm%C2%B2%20with%20large%20fluctuations%20during%20the%20most%20intense%20phase%20of%20the%20fire. obtainsSupportFrom DMJDSD assertion.
• Self-extinction%20of%20flames%20at%20the%20CLT%20wall%20and%20ceiling%20occurred%20at%20temperatures%20between%20805%20and%20845%20%C2%B0C%20and%20an%20incident%20heat%20flux%20of%2070%E2%80%9384%20kW%2Fm%C2%B2. obtainsSupportFrom j.firesaf.2023.103986 assertion.
• Self-extinction%20of%20flames%20at%20the%20CLT%20wall%20and%20ceiling%20occurred%20at%20temperatures%20between%20805%20and%20845%20%C2%B0C%20and%20an%20incident%20heat%20flux%20of%2070%E2%80%9384%20kW%2Fm%C2%B2. obtainsSupportFrom DMJDSD assertion.
• During%20the%20most%20intense%20burning%20phase%2C%20the%20oxygen%20concentration%20measured%20through%20Window%204%20dropped%20to%200%25. obtainsSupportFrom j.firesaf.2023.103986 assertion.
• During%20the%20most%20intense%20burning%20phase%2C%20the%20oxygen%20concentration%20measured%20through%20Window%204%20dropped%20to%200%25. obtainsSupportFrom DMJDSD assertion.
• The%20maximum%20heat%20release%20rate%20%28HRR%29%20from%20the%20combined%20wood%20crib%20and%20CLT%20was%20estimated%20to%20be%2073%20MW. obtainsSupportFrom j.firesaf.2023.103986 assertion.
• The%20maximum%20heat%20release%20rate%20%28HRR%29%20from%20the%20combined%20wood%20crib%20and%20CLT%20was%20estimated%20to%20be%2073%20MW. obtainsSupportFrom DMJDSD assertion.
• In%20%23FRIC-02%2C%20the%20ceiling%20fire%20continued%20to%20spread%20and%20developed%20into%20a%20full%20flashover%201.5%20min%20after%20the%20ceiling%20was%20ignited. obtainsSupportFrom j.firesaf.2023.103986 assertion.
• In%20%23FRIC-02%2C%20the%20ceiling%20fire%20continued%20to%20spread%20and%20developed%20into%20a%20full%20flashover%201.5%20min%20after%20the%20ceiling%20was%20ignited. obtainsSupportFrom DMJDSD assertion.
• In%20%23FRIC-02%2C%20the%20fire%20spread%20across%20the%20room%20in%20less%20than%203.5%20min%20from%20ignition%20with%20a%20spread%20rate%20of%205.5%20m%2Fmin. obtainsSupportFrom j.firesaf.2023.103986 assertion.
• In%20%23FRIC-02%2C%20the%20fire%20spread%20across%20the%20room%20in%20less%20than%203.5%20min%20from%20ignition%20with%20a%20spread%20rate%20of%205.5%20m%2Fmin. obtainsSupportFrom DMJDSD assertion.
• The%20maximum%20HRR%20of%20the%20wood%20crib%20was%20determined%20to%20be%2015%20MW%20%2875%25%29%20higher%20in%20%23FRIC-02%20than%20in%20%23FRIC-01. obtainsSupportFrom j.firesaf.2023.103986 assertion.
• The%20maximum%20HRR%20of%20the%20wood%20crib%20was%20determined%20to%20be%2015%20MW%20%2875%25%29%20higher%20in%20%23FRIC-02%20than%20in%20%23FRIC-01. obtainsSupportFrom DMJDSD assertion.
• In%20%23FRIC-02%2C%205%20MW%20of%20the%20increased%20HRR%20was%20due%20to%20the%20higher%20HRR%20per%20unit%20length%20caused%20by%20higher%20temperatures%20and%20heat%20fluxes%20towards%20the%20wood%20crib. obtainsSupportFrom j.firesaf.2023.103986 assertion.
• In%20%23FRIC-02%2C%205%20MW%20of%20the%20increased%20HRR%20was%20due%20to%20the%20higher%20HRR%20per%20unit%20length%20caused%20by%20higher%20temperatures%20and%20heat%20fluxes%20towards%20the%20wood%20crib. obtainsSupportFrom DMJDSD assertion.
• In%20%23FRIC-02%2C%20the%20remaining%2010%20MW%20of%20increased%20HRR%20was%20due%20to%20faster%20fire%20spread%20across%20the%20wood%20crib. obtainsSupportFrom j.firesaf.2023.103986 assertion.
• In%20%23FRIC-02%2C%20the%20remaining%2010%20MW%20of%20increased%20HRR%20was%20due%20to%20faster%20fire%20spread%20across%20the%20wood%20crib. obtainsSupportFrom DMJDSD assertion.
• The%20average%20charring%20rates%20in%20%23FRIC-02%20were%2021%25%20and%2028%25%20faster%20than%20in%20%23FRIC-01%20for%200%E2%80%9310%20mm%20and%2010%E2%80%9320%20mm%20depth%2C%20respectively. obtainsSupportFrom j.firesaf.2023.103986 assertion.
• The%20average%20charring%20rates%20in%20%23FRIC-02%20were%2021%25%20and%2028%25%20faster%20than%20in%20%23FRIC-01%20for%200%E2%80%9310%20mm%20and%2010%E2%80%9320%20mm%20depth%2C%20respectively. obtainsSupportFrom DMJDSD assertion.
• The%20increased%20charring%20rates%20in%20%23FRIC-02%20correspond%20to%20an%20estimated%20HRR%20increase%20for%20the%20ceiling%20of%203.5%20MW. obtainsSupportFrom j.firesaf.2023.103986 assertion.
• The%20increased%20charring%20rates%20in%20%23FRIC-02%20correspond%20to%20an%20estimated%20HRR%20increase%20for%20the%20ceiling%20of%203.5%20MW. obtainsSupportFrom DMJDSD assertion.
• The%20external%20flames%20in%20%23FRIC-02%20were%20highly%20non-symmetrical%20due%20to%20wind%20conditions. obtainsSupportFrom j.firesaf.2023.103986 assertion.
• The%20external%20flames%20in%20%23FRIC-02%20were%20highly%20non-symmetrical%20due%20to%20wind%20conditions. obtainsSupportFrom DMJDSD assertion.
• The%20wind%20conditions%20in%20%23FRIC-02%20caused%20an%20underpressure%20outside%20of%20Window%204%2C%20leading%20to%20particularly%20large%20external%20flames%20from%20this%20window. obtainsSupportFrom j.firesaf.2023.103986 assertion.
• The%20wind%20conditions%20in%20%23FRIC-02%20caused%20an%20underpressure%20outside%20of%20Window%204%2C%20leading%20to%20particularly%20large%20external%20flames%20from%20this%20window. obtainsSupportFrom DMJDSD assertion.
• In%20%23FRIC-02%2C%20the%20temperatures%20during%20the%20most%20intense%20period%20were%201010%E2%80%931172%20%C2%B0C%20in%20the%20whole%20compartment. obtainsSupportFrom j.firesaf.2023.103986 assertion.
• In%20%23FRIC-02%2C%20the%20temperatures%20during%20the%20most%20intense%20period%20were%201010%E2%80%931172%20%C2%B0C%20in%20the%20whole%20compartment. obtainsSupportFrom DMJDSD assertion.
• The%20maximum%20HRR%20in%20%23FRIC-02%20was%2032%20MW%20%2878%25%29%20higher%20than%20in%20%23FRIC-01. obtainsSupportFrom j.firesaf.2023.103986 assertion.
• The%20maximum%20HRR%20in%20%23FRIC-02%20was%2032%20MW%20%2878%25%29%20higher%20than%20in%20%23FRIC-01. obtainsSupportFrom DMJDSD assertion.
• In%20%23FRIC-02%2C%20the%20fire%20growth%20rate%20was%20measured%20at%205.7%20%C2%B0C%2Fmin%20for%20the%20compartment%20temperature%20during%20the%20growth%20phase. obtainsSupportFrom j.firesaf.2023.103986 assertion.
• In%20%23FRIC-02%2C%20the%20fire%20growth%20rate%20was%20measured%20at%205.7%20%C2%B0C%2Fmin%20for%20the%20compartment%20temperature%20during%20the%20growth%20phase. obtainsSupportFrom DMJDSD assertion.
• %23FRIC-02%20exhibited%20a%20second%20flashover%20and%20subsequent%20fluctuations%20of%20fire%20intensity%2060%20min%20after%20extinction%20of%20flames%20at%20the%20CLT. obtainsSupportFrom j.firesaf.2023.103986 assertion.
• %23FRIC-02%20exhibited%20a%20second%20flashover%20and%20subsequent%20fluctuations%20of%20fire%20intensity%2060%20min%20after%20extinction%20of%20flames%20at%20the%20CLT. obtainsSupportFrom DMJDSD assertion.
• In%20%23FRIC-02%2C%20delamination%20occurred%20simultaneously%20in%20multiple%20locations%2C%20contributing%20to%20the%20transition%20of%20larger%20flames%20and%20the%20second%20flashover. obtainsSupportFrom j.firesaf.2023.103986 assertion.
• In%20%23FRIC-02%2C%20delamination%20occurred%20simultaneously%20in%20multiple%20locations%2C%20contributing%20to%20the%20transition%20of%20larger%20flames%20and%20the%20second%20flashover. obtainsSupportFrom DMJDSD assertion.
• The%20charring%20of%20the%20CLT%20in%20%23FRIC-02%20was%20strongly%20non-uniform%2C%20with%20increasing%20char%20depth%20from%20the%20window%20opening%20to%20the%20back%20wall. obtainsSupportFrom j.firesaf.2023.103986 assertion.
• The%20charring%20of%20the%20CLT%20in%20%23FRIC-02%20was%20strongly%20non-uniform%2C%20with%20increasing%20char%20depth%20from%20the%20window%20opening%20to%20the%20back%20wall. obtainsSupportFrom DMJDSD assertion.
• Self-extinction%20of%20flames%20at%20the%20CLT%20in%20%23FRIC-02%20occurred%20at%20temperatures%20805%E2%80%93845%20%C2%B0C%20and%20incident%20heat%20flux%2070%E2%80%9384%20kW%2Fm%C2%B2. obtainsSupportFrom j.firesaf.2023.103986 assertion.
• Self-extinction%20of%20flames%20at%20the%20CLT%20in%20%23FRIC-02%20occurred%20at%20temperatures%20805%E2%80%93845%20%C2%B0C%20and%20incident%20heat%20flux%2070%E2%80%9384%20kW%2Fm%C2%B2. obtainsSupportFrom DMJDSD assertion.
• The%20CLT%20wall%20contributed%20to%20emissions%20of%20combustible%20gases%20before%20and%20after%20ignition%2C%20increasing%20radiation%20to%20the%20wood%20crib%20and%20the%20ceiling. obtainsSupportFrom j.firesaf.2023.103986 assertion.
• The%20CLT%20wall%20contributed%20to%20emissions%20of%20combustible%20gases%20before%20and%20after%20ignition%2C%20increasing%20radiation%20to%20the%20wood%20crib%20and%20the%20ceiling. obtainsSupportFrom DMJDSD assertion.
• In%20%23FRIC-02%2C%20the%20top%20of%20the%20wall%20ignited%20about%20the%20same%20time%20as%20the%20ceiling%2C%20enhancing%20fire%20spread. obtainsSupportFrom j.firesaf.2023.103986 assertion.
• In%20%23FRIC-02%2C%20the%20top%20of%20the%20wall%20ignited%20about%20the%20same%20time%20as%20the%20ceiling%2C%20enhancing%20fire%20spread. obtainsSupportFrom DMJDSD assertion.
• The%20exposed%20CLT%20wall%20resulted%20in%20an%20increased%20combustion%20rate%20of%20the%20wood%20crib%20and%20CLT%20ceiling%2C%20with%2013%20MW%20directly%20caused%20by%20the%20combustion%20of%20the%20CLT%20wall. obtainsSupportFrom j.firesaf.2023.103986 assertion.
• The%20exposed%20CLT%20wall%20resulted%20in%20an%20increased%20combustion%20rate%20of%20the%20wood%20crib%20and%20CLT%20ceiling%2C%20with%2013%20MW%20directly%20caused%20by%20the%20combustion%20of%20the%20CLT%20wall. obtainsSupportFrom DMJDSD assertion.
• Students%E2%80%99%20perceived%20usefulness%20of%20ChatGPT%20is%20increasing%20with%20variables%20such%20as%20general%20enthusiasm%20about%20new%20technology%2C%20ease%20of%20use%2C%20trustworthiness%2C%20and%20social%20influence%20from%20friends. obtainsSupportFrom j.jaccedu.2024.100932 assertion.
• Students%E2%80%99%20perceived%20usefulness%20of%20ChatGPT%20is%20increasing%20with%20variables%20such%20as%20general%20enthusiasm%20about%20new%20technology%2C%20ease%20of%20use%2C%20trustworthiness%2C%20and%20social%20influence%20from%20friends. obtainsSupportFrom USN.27257955 assertion.
• The%20intention%20to%20use%20ChatGPT%20in%20a%20study%20context%20in%20the%20future%20is%20increasing%20with%20variables%20such%20as%20general%20enthusiasm%20about%20new%20technology%2C%20ease%20of%20use%2C%20and%20social%20influence%20from%20friends%2C%20except%20for%20trustworthiness. obtainsSupportFrom j.jaccedu.2024.100932 assertion.
• The%20intention%20to%20use%20ChatGPT%20in%20a%20study%20context%20in%20the%20future%20is%20increasing%20with%20variables%20such%20as%20general%20enthusiasm%20about%20new%20technology%2C%20ease%20of%20use%2C%20and%20social%20influence%20from%20friends%2C%20except%20for%20trustworthiness. obtainsSupportFrom USN.27257955 assertion.
• Students%20who%20have%20previously%20used%20ChatGPT%20find%20it%20more%20likely%20that%20they%20will%20use%20it%20in%20a%20study%20context%20in%20the%20future. obtainsSupportFrom j.jaccedu.2024.100932 assertion.
• Students%20who%20have%20previously%20used%20ChatGPT%20find%20it%20more%20likely%20that%20they%20will%20use%20it%20in%20a%20study%20context%20in%20the%20future. obtainsSupportFrom USN.27257955 assertion.
• The%20use%20of%20ChatGPT%20seems%20to%20depend%20upon%20type%20of%20course%2C%20and%20the%20students%20are%20more%20likely%20to%20use%20ChatGPT%20in%20other%20courses%20than%20accounting%20courses. obtainsSupportFrom j.jaccedu.2024.100932 assertion.
• The%20use%20of%20ChatGPT%20seems%20to%20depend%20upon%20type%20of%20course%2C%20and%20the%20students%20are%20more%20likely%20to%20use%20ChatGPT%20in%20other%20courses%20than%20accounting%20courses. obtainsSupportFrom USN.27257955 assertion.
• Students%20are%20most%20likely%20to%20use%20ChatGPT%20to%20answer%20course-specific%20questions%2C%20and%20least%20likely%20to%20use%20it%20on%20exams. obtainsSupportFrom j.jaccedu.2024.100932 assertion.
• Students%20are%20most%20likely%20to%20use%20ChatGPT%20to%20answer%20course-specific%20questions%2C%20and%20least%20likely%20to%20use%20it%20on%20exams. obtainsSupportFrom USN.27257955 assertion.
• Several%20students%20seem%20to%20be%20aware%20that%20the%20answers%20from%20ChatGPT%20cannot%20always%20be%20trusted%2C%20but%20few%20mention%20that%20using%20ChatGPT%20in%20a%20study%20context%20can%20also%20have%20other%20negative%20effects%20on%20learning%20outcomes. obtainsSupportFrom j.jaccedu.2024.100932 assertion.
• Several%20students%20seem%20to%20be%20aware%20that%20the%20answers%20from%20ChatGPT%20cannot%20always%20be%20trusted%2C%20but%20few%20mention%20that%20using%20ChatGPT%20in%20a%20study%20context%20can%20also%20have%20other%20negative%20effects%20on%20learning%20outcomes. obtainsSupportFrom USN.27257955 assertion.
• Eleven%20of%20our%20respondents%20used%20ChatGPT%20for%20the%20first%20time%20in%20March%202023. obtainsSupportFrom j.jaccedu.2024.100932 assertion.
• Eleven%20of%20our%20respondents%20used%20ChatGPT%20for%20the%20first%20time%20in%20March%202023. obtainsSupportFrom USN.27257955 assertion.
• The%20XiFoam%20model%2Fsolver%20gave%20an%20overall%20acceptable%20model%20performance%20for%20both%20geometries%20and%20gas%20composition. obtainsSupportFrom j.jlp.2022.104761 assertion.
• The%20XiFoam%20model%2Fsolver%20gave%20an%20overall%20acceptable%20model%20performance%20for%20both%20geometries%20and%20gas%20composition. obtainsSupportFrom USN.15134442 assertion.

• first
• previous
• next