Matches in Nanopublications for { ?s <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment> ?o ?g. }
- VocBench comment "VocBench is a web-based, multilingual, collaborative development platform for managing OWL ontologies, SKOS(/XL) thesauri, Ontolex-lemon lexicons and generic RDF datasets." assertion.
- VocBench comment "VocBench is a web-based, multilingual, collaborative development platform for managing OWL ontologies, SKOS(/XL) thesauri, Ontolex-lemon lexicons and generic RDF datasets." assertion.
- VocBench comment "VocBench is a web-based, multilingual, collaborative development platform for managing OWL ontologies, SKOS(/XL) thesauri, Ontolex-lemon lexicons and generic RDF datasets." assertion.
- assertion comment "It's very nice to see a nanopublication for this manuscript. The assertion makes sense, except for the subclass statement. It doesn't seem accurate to me to state that this indicator is a kind of concept drift. It seems to be an indicator for the phenomenon of concept drift, but the indicators themselves are different from the phenomena they describe. Therefore, I'd suggest to mark it as a subclass of something like "Indicator"." assertion.
- assertion comment "On top of my previous message about the choice of the subclass, it could be considered to make it an instance of such a class instead of a subclass. Is the term "Unstable Population Indicator" supposed to stand for a whole set of individual things (then it should be a class) or just a single (conceptual) entity (then it should be an instance as a member of a class like "Indicator")." assertion.
- MARCXML comment "The MARC formats are standards for the representation and communication of bibliographic and related information in machine-readable form. MARCXML is an XML encoding of the MARC 21 format." assertion.
- MODS comment "Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) is a schema for a bibliographic element set that may be used for a variety of purposes, and particularly for library applications. As an XML schema it is intended to be able to carry selected data from existing MARC 21 records as well as to enable the creation of original resource description records. MODS is intended to complement other metadata formats. For some applications, particularly those that have used MARC records, there will be advantages over other metadata schemes. Some advantages are: the element set is richer than Dublin Core; the element set is more compatible with library data than ONIX; the schema is more end user oriented than the full MARCXML schema; the element set is simpler than the full MARC format. Please note that round-tripping between MARC 21 and MODS is not guaranteed." assertion.
- MODS comment "Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) is a schema for a bibliographic element set that may be used for a variety of purposes, and particularly for library applications. As an XML schema it is intended to be able to carry selected data from existing MARC 21 records as well as to enable the creation of original resource description records. MODS is intended to complement other metadata formats. For some applications, particularly those that have used MARC records, there will be advantages over other metadata schemes. Some advantages are: the element set is richer than Dublin Core; the element set is more compatible with library data than ONIX; the schema is more end user oriented than the full MARCXML schema; the element set is simpler than the full MARC format. Please note that round-tripping between MARC 21 and MODS is not guaranteed." assertion.
- DRI comment "The Digital Repository of Ireland is a trusted national infrastructure for the preservation, curation, and dissemination of Ireland’s humanities, social sciences, and cultural heritage data. DRI operates on a membership model, providing stewardship of digital data from a range of member organisations including higher education institutions, cultural heritage institutions (the GLAM sector of galleries, libraries, archives, and museums), government agencies, and county councils. DRI also offers some free DRI Memberships and related benefits to organisations that operate on a non-funded basis as part of the DRI Community Archive Scheme. " assertion.
- DRI comment "The Digital Repository of Ireland is a trusted national infrastructure for the preservation, curation, and dissemination of Ireland’s humanities, social sciences, and cultural heritage data. DRI operates on a membership model, providing stewardship of digital data from a range of member organisations including higher education institutions, cultural heritage institutions (the GLAM sector of galleries, libraries, archives, and museums), government agencies, and county councils. DRI also offers some free DRI Memberships and related benefits to organisations that operate on a non-funded basis as part of the DRI Community Archive Scheme. " assertion.
- TDWG comment "Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG), also known as the Taxonomic Databases Working Group, is a is a not-for-profit, scientific and educational association formed to establish international collaboration among the creators, managers and users of biodiversity information and to promote the wider and more effective dissemination and sharing of knowledge about the world's heritage of biological organisms. It is affiliated with the International Union of Biological Sciences. TDWG was formed to establish international collaboration among biological database projects. TDWG promoted the wider and more effective dissemination of information about the World's heritage of biological organisms for the benefit of the world at large. Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG) now focuses on the development of standards for the exchange of biological/biodiversity data. The TDWG develops, adopts and promotes standards and guidelines for the recording and exchange of data about organisms. Additionally, it promotes the use of standards through the most appropriate and effective means. The TDWG acts as a forum for discussion through holding meetings and through publications. Logo covered under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License." assertion.
- educational-use comment "A Rights Statement indicating that content is protected by copyright and/or related rights, but reuse is allowed in accordance with copyright and related rights legislation that applies to the particular use. In addition, no permission is required from the rights-holder(s) for educational uses. For other uses, permission must be obtained from the rights-holder(s)." assertion.
- open-gov-3.0 comment "This licence grants worldwide, royalty-free, perpetual, non-exclusive licence to use the Information subject to certain conditions. Updated information about this licence is maintained by The National Archives. " assertion.
- premis-3.0 comment "The PREMIS Data Dictionary for Preservation Metadata is the international standard for metadata to support the preservation of digital objects and ensure their long-term usability. Developed by an international team of experts, PREMIS is implemented in digital preservation projects around the world, and support for PREMIS is incorporated into a number of commercial and open-source digital preservation tools and systems. The PREMIS Editorial Committee coordinates revisions and implementation of the standard, which consists of the Data Dictionary, an XML schema, and supporting documentation." assertion.
- association comment "Subjective synonymy based on morphological comparison of the type specimens of the two species names" assertion.
- NMDC comment "NMDC is building an agile, integrated data ecosystem to support the long-term advancement of microbiome science. Our scientific mission is to provide comprehensive discovery of and access to multi-omics microbiome data. The long-term vision of the NMDC is to support microbiome data exploration through a sustainable data discovery portal that promotes open science and shared-ownership. Currently funded by the US Department of Energy." assertion.
- MLCommons comment "MLCommons is an Artificial Intelligence engineering consortium, built on a philosophy of open collaboration to improve AI systems. Through its collective engineering efforts with industry and academia MLCommons continually measures and improves the accuracy, safety, speed and efficiency of AI technologies–helping companies and universities around the world build better AI systems that will benefit society. " assertion.
- mllog comment "mllog is used by the Machine Learning Commons (MLCommons) community to produce logs that document benchmark runs." assertion.
- Apache-2 comment "The Apache License is a permissive free software license written by the Apache Software Foundation (ASF). The Apache License 2.0 attempts to forestall potential patent litigation." assertion.
- ChEBI comment "Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) is a freely available dictionary of molecular entities focused on ‘small’ chemical compounds." assertion.
- ChEBI comment "Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) is a freely available dictionary of molecular entities focused on ‘small’ chemical compounds." assertion.
- ChEBI comment "Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) is a freely available dictionary of molecular entities focused on ‘small’ chemical compounds." assertion.
- assertion comment "And on that note, I'm also hiring applied researchers with a penchant for muddling through complex problem spaces and a deep interest in co-operative ecosystems. Skills in text embeddings, discourse analysis and protocol-thinking a plus, but at this stage, mostly looking for folks who enjoy synthesizing and identifying common threads. Please share with your network if it might be a good fit! https://v6acolab.org/Work-With-US" assertion.
- assertion comment "I've just spent a pleasant half hour leafing through Michel Talagrand's "What is a Quantum Field Theory?" https://www.amazon.com/What-Quantum-Field-Theory-Mathematicians/dp/1316510271 I suspect this is a book that would repay close study, even for many people who know quantum field theory much better than I ever did (though maybe not true experts?). At quite a few points I found myself thinking "oh, that's very well put!", which is usually a sign a textbook is worth engaging with! I don't plan to study this in depth - I looked at it because of Talagrand winning the Abel Prize today - but it was a lot of fun to look!" assertion.
- assertion comment "A new quote tweet of something I love https://twitter.com/VitalikButerin/status/1793505119792677089" assertion.
- assertion comment "A new quote tweet of something I love https://twitter.com/VitalikButerin/status/1793505119792677089" assertion.
- assertion comment "A new quote tweet of something I love https://twitter.com/VitalikButerin/status/1793505119792677089" assertion.
- assertion comment "A new quote tweet of something I love https://twitter.com/VitalikButerin/status/1793505119792677089" assertion.
- assertion comment "A new quote tweet of something I love https://twitter.com/VitalikButerin/status/1793505119792677089" assertion.
- assertion comment "A new quote tweet of something I love https://twitter.com/VitalikButerin/status/1793505119792677089" assertion.
- assertion comment "A new quote tweet of something I love https://twitter.com/VitalikButerin/status/1793505119792677089" assertion.
- assertion comment "Lets test this link http://pepo.is" assertion.
- assertion comment "Observation of adult stage in sugarcane fields in a tropical agricultural Ribeirão Preto, Brazil. 2023-08-10T22:17:11Z" assertion.
- CSO-ICRP comment "The CSO is complemented by a standard cancer type coding scheme. Together, these tools lay a framework to improve coordination among research organizations, making it possible to compare and contrast the research portfolios of public, non-profit, and governmental research agencies" assertion.
- CSO-ICRP comment "The CSO is complemented by a standard cancer type coding scheme. Together, these tools lay a framework to improve coordination among research organizations, making it possible to compare and contrast the research portfolios of public, non-profit, and governmental research agencies" assertion.
- SusDat comment "NORMAN SusDat merges the many chemical lists on the SLE into a common format and includes all data suitable for screening purposes, along with selected identifiers and predicted values as a service for NORMAN members and beyond" assertion.
- SLE-MS comment "The NORMAN Suspect List Exchange (NORMAN-SLE) was established in 2015 as a central access point for NORMAN members (and others) to find suspect lists relevant for their environmental monitoring questions." assertion.
- SLE-MPP comment "The NORMAN-SLE documents all individual collections that form a part of the merged collection NORMAN SusDat. NORMAN-SLE versions are tracked on Zenodo. " assertion.
- RCX comment "RECETOX is engaged in research and education on managing the environmental and health risks associated with the chemicals around us" assertion.
- RCX-GEN comment "GENASIS (Global ENvironmental ASsessment Information System) provides a comprehensive information on contamination of the environment by chemicals, namely persistent organic pollutans (POPs)." assertion.
- DwC comment "Darwin Core is a standard maintained by the Darwin Core Maintenance Interest Group. It includes a glossary of terms (in other contexts these might be called properties, elements, fields, columns, attributes, or concepts) intended to facilitate the sharing of information about biological diversity by providing identifiers, labels, and definitions. Darwin Core is primarily based on taxa, their occurrence in nature as documented by observations, specimens, samples, and related information." assertion.
- assertion comment "this is a tweet that references two other tweets! https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1795069204418175459 --- I see that it only caught the second link as the quote tweet, but didn't include this as a quote tweet: https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 --- more quote tweets in this thread https://x.com/rtk254/status/1798549107507974626" assertion.
- assertion comment "this is a tweet that references two other tweets! https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1795069204418175459 --- I see that it only caught the second link as the quote tweet, but didn't include this as a quote tweet: https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 --- more quote tweets in this thread https://x.com/rtk254/status/1798549107507974626" assertion.
- GEN-OT comment "Data templates for air, water, sediment, soil, atmospheric deposition, and plants." assertion.
- GEN-DV comment "GENASIS Data Visualization is a tool for visualisation and interpretation of the validated and harmonized data coming from the environment stored in the GENASIS Database." assertion.
- FAIRsharing.41b655 comment "The Ringgold ID is a Persistent Identifier (PID) that assigns a unique numerical identifier to organizations for use across the scholarly communications sector. Ringgold assigns each organization an Identify Database record ID, and includes organizations which are part of the scholarly ecosystem – licensees, publishers, intermediaries, and funders – as well as those which license and create scholarly content – universities, hospitals, corporations, and government entities. Ringgold is a part of the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) and contains 600,000+ records encompassing publishers, funders, research organizations, universities, intermediaries, and more." assertion.
- assertion comment "this is a tweet that references two other tweets! https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1795069204418175459 --- I see that it only caught the second link as the quote tweet, but didn't include this as a quote tweet: https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 --- more quote tweets in this thread https://x.com/rtk254/status/1798549107507974626" assertion.
- RinggoldIdentifyDB comment "A curated database of over 600,000 organization records with rich hierarchies and over 30 descriptive metadata elements." assertion.
- QPRF comment "The QSAR Prediction Reporting Format (QPRF) is a harmonised template for summarizing and reporting substance-specific predictions generated by (Q)SAR models. The information is structured according to the OECD template (v.2.0)." assertion.
- assertion comment "this is a tweet that references two other tweets! https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1795069204418175459 --- I see that it only caught the second link as the quote tweet, but didn't include this as a quote tweet: https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 --- more quote tweets in this thread https://x.com/rtk254/status/1798549107507974626" assertion.
- assertion comment "this is a tweet that references two other tweets! https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1795069204418175459 --- I see that it only caught the second link as the quote tweet, but didn't include this as a quote tweet: https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 --- more quote tweets in this thread https://x.com/rtk254/status/1798549107507974626" assertion.
- assertion comment "this is a tweet that references two other tweets! https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1795069204418175459 --- I see that it only caught the second link as the quote tweet, but didn't include this as a quote tweet: https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 --- more quote tweets in this thread https://x.com/rtk254/status/1798549107507974626" assertion.
- assertion comment "this is a tweet that references two other tweets! https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1795069204418175459 --- I see that it only caught the second link as the quote tweet, but didn't include this as a quote tweet: https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 --- more quote tweets in this thread https://x.com/rtk254/status/1798549107507974626" assertion.
- assertion comment "this is a tweet that references two other tweets! https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1795069204418175459 --- I see that it only caught the second link as the quote tweet, but didn't include this as a quote tweet: https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 --- more quote tweets in this thread https://x.com/rtk254/status/1798549107507974626" assertion.
- assertion comment "this is a tweet that references two other tweets! https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1795069204418175459 --- I see that it only caught the second link as the quote tweet, but didn't include this as a quote tweet: https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 --- more quote tweets in this thread https://x.com/rtk254/status/1798549107507974626" assertion.
- assertion comment "this is a tweet that references two other tweets! https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1795069204418175459 --- I see that it only caught the second link as the quote tweet, but didn't include this as a quote tweet: https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 --- more quote tweets in this thread https://x.com/rtk254/status/1798549107507974626" assertion.
- FAIRDataStation comment "The FAIR Data Station is a metadata ingestion platform that helps to improve the quality of metadata. The station allows users to record meta-data according to minimum information standards thereby ensuring FAIR scientific data management from the start." assertion.
- FAIRDataStation comment "The FAIR Data Station is a metadata ingestion platform that helps to improve the quality of metadata. The station allows users to record meta-data according to minimum information standards thereby ensuring FAIR scientific data management from the start." assertion.
- ROHub comment "Research object management platform supporting the preservation and lifecycle management of scientific investigations, research campaigns and operational processes." assertion.
- assertion comment "this is a tweet that references two other tweets! https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1795069204418175459 --- I see that it only caught the second link as the quote tweet, but didn't include this as a quote tweet: https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 --- more quote tweets in this thread https://x.com/rtk254/status/1798549107507974626" assertion.
- assertion comment "this is a tweet that references two other tweets! https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1795069204418175459 --- I see that it only caught the second link as the quote tweet, but didn't include this as a quote tweet: https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 --- more quote tweets in this thread https://x.com/rtk254/status/1798549107507974626" assertion.
- assertion comment "I do like https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-01716-y" assertion.
- assertion comment "Love this https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-01717-x" assertion.
- assertion comment "Love this https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-01717-x" assertion.
- assertion comment "Love this https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-01717-x" assertion.
- assertion comment "Love this https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-01717-x" assertion.
- assertion comment "saw this? https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-01720-2" assertion.
- assertion comment "amazing https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-01508-4" assertion.
- assertion comment "Love this https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-01717-x" assertion.
- assertion comment "I do like https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-01716-y" assertion.
- assertion comment "Fake news https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-01716-y" assertion.
- assertion comment "Lets test this link http://pepo.is" assertion.
- assertion comment "Lets test this link http://pepo.is" assertion.
- assertion comment "Lets test this link http://pepo.is" assertion.
- assertion comment "You should check this https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-01732-y" assertion.
- assertion comment "I like https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-01711-3" assertion.
- assertion comment "Testing our new app on this great new paper https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.04607" assertion.
- assertion comment "Testing our new app on this great new paper https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.04607" assertion.
- assertion comment "Testing our new app on this great new paper as well https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.04607" assertion.
- TCP-IP comment "The Internet protocol suite, commonly known as TCP/IP, is a framework for organizing the set of communication protocols used in the Internet and similar computer networks according to functional criteria. The foundational protocols in the suite are the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), the User Datagram Protocol (UDP), and the Internet Protocol (IP). Early versions of this networking model were known as the Department of Defense (DoD) model because the research and development were funded by the United States Department of Defense through DARPA. The Internet protocol suite provides end-to-end data communication specifying how data should be packetized, addressed, transmitted, routed, and received. This functionality is organized into four abstraction layers, which classify all related protocols according to each protocol's scope of networking. An implementation of the layers for a particular application forms a protocol stack. From lowest to highest, the layers are the link layer, containing communication methods for data that remains within a single network segment (link); the internet layer, providing internet working between independent networks; the transport layer, handling host-to-host communication; and the application layer, providing process-to-process data exchange for applications." assertion.
- TCP-IP comment "The Internet protocol suite, commonly known as TCP/IP, is a framework for organizing the set of communication protocols used in the Internet and similar computer networks according to functional criteria. The foundational protocols in the suite are the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), the User Datagram Protocol (UDP), and the Internet Protocol (IP). Early versions of this networking model were known as the Department of Defense (DoD) model because the research and development were funded by the United States Department of Defense through DARPA. The Internet protocol suite provides end-to-end data communication specifying how data should be packetized, addressed, transmitted, routed, and received. This functionality is organized into four abstraction layers, which classify all related protocols according to each protocol's scope of networking. An implementation of the layers for a particular application forms a protocol stack. From lowest to highest, the layers are the link layer, containing communication methods for data that remains within a single network segment (link); the internet layer, providing internet working between independent networks; the transport layer, handling host-to-host communication; and the application layer, providing process-to-process data exchange for applications." assertion.
- TCP-IP comment "The Internet protocol suite, commonly known as TCP/IP, is a framework for organizing the set of communication protocols used in the Internet and similar computer networks according to functional criteria. The foundational protocols in the suite are the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), the User Datagram Protocol (UDP), and the Internet Protocol (IP). Early versions of this networking model were known as the Department of Defense (DoD) model because the research and development were funded by the United States Department of Defense through DARPA. The Internet protocol suite provides end-to-end data communication specifying how data should be packetized, addressed, transmitted, routed, and received. This functionality is organized into four abstraction layers, which classify all related protocols according to each protocol's scope of networking. An implementation of the layers for a particular application forms a protocol stack. From lowest to highest, the layers are the link layer, containing communication methods for data that remains within a single network segment (link); the internet layer, providing internet working between independent networks; the transport layer, handling host-to-host communication; and the application layer, providing process-to-process data exchange for applications. (the text above was adapted from Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_protocol_suite)" assertion.
- TCP-IP comment "The Internet protocol suite, commonly known as TCP/IP, is a framework for organizing the set of communication protocols used in the Internet and similar computer networks according to functional criteria. The foundational protocols in the suite are the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), the User Datagram Protocol (UDP), and the Internet Protocol (IP). Early versions of this networking model were known as the Department of Defense (DoD) model because the research and development were funded by the United States Department of Defense through DARPA. The Internet protocol suite provides end-to-end data communication specifying how data should be packetized, addressed, transmitted, routed, and received. This functionality is organized into four abstraction layers, which classify all related protocols according to each protocol's scope of networking. An implementation of the layers for a particular application forms a protocol stack. From lowest to highest, the layers are the link layer, containing communication methods for data that remains within a single network segment (link); the internet layer, providing internet working between independent networks; the transport layer, handling host-to-host communication; and the application layer, providing process-to-process data exchange for applications. (the text above was adapted from Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_protocol_suite)" assertion.
- assertion comment "here's another good paper https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.07.007" assertion.
- assertion comment "Can we create this future please? "Collective Intelligence as a great scientific, technical, and political project that aims to 'make people smarter with computers, instead of trying to make computers smarter than people'" https://twitter.com/rtk254/status/1801242388209217973/photo/1 --- source - https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-58191-5_2 --- This is also cool.. I think I need to read more of Pierre Levy's works https://twitter.com/rtk254/status/1801242912736309401/photo/1" assertion.
- MP3 comment "Open standard lossy compression format for digital audio." assertion.
- WAV comment "File format standard for storing audio on PCs." assertion.
- TGN comment "The Getty Thesaurus of Geographic Names ® (TGN), the Art & Architecture Thesaurus ® (AAT), the Union List of Artist Names ® (ULAN), the Cultural Objects Name Authority ® (CONA), and the Iconography Authority ™ (IA) are structured resources that can be used to improve access to information about art, architecture, and material culture. They are not simple 'value vocabularies,' but unique, rich knowledge bases in themselves. Through rich metadata and links, the Getty Vocabularies provide powerful conduits for knowledge creation, research, and discovery for digital art history and related disciplines." assertion.
- NTA comment "identifier for person names (not: works nor organisations) from the Dutch National Thesaurus for Author names (which also contains non-authors)" assertion.
- BCL comment "De Nederlandse basisclassificatie (NBC) is een van oorsprong Nederlands bibliotheek classificatie-schema speciaal ontwikkeld voor wetenschappelijke bibliotheken. Deze classificatie is eind jaren tachtig van de twintigste eeuw ontwikkeld onder leiding van de Koninklijke Bibliotheek (Nederland), in gebruik sinds 1990 en wordt sindsdien bijgewerkt. https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nederlandse_Basisclassificatie" assertion.
- AST comment "A structured vocabulary of more than 13000 English terms in the field of African studies, the African Studies Thesaurus is developed and maintained by staff at the library of the African Studies Centre Leiden (ASCL). It is used for indexing and retrieving material in the library collection and is directly linked to the catalogue." assertion.
- nanopubs-way-to-create-even-more-silos.html comment "Hi Roderic, Great to see that you decided to look into nanopublications and get to the bottom of it. Let me respond to some of the points you raised and clarify a few misunderstandings and inaccuracies. > Nanopubs, a way to create even more silos The title is highly misleading in my view. You can use any kind of URI-based identifiers in nanopublications, so any silo-ness on the conceptual level is user-generated and not a shortcoming of the nanopublication technology. And on the data storage level, nanopublications are born in the global decentralized nanopublication network and never live in just one location, so they are as anti-silo as you can be in that respect. The nanopublication you mention can be found at all these places: - https://server.np.trustyuri.net/RAXCvEZfCcjYuH5DWOIujBehGQt61y_nRHWssw9u6aYig - http://130.60.24.146:7880/RAXCvEZfCcjYuH5DWOIujBehGQt61y_nRHWssw9u6aYig - https://server.np.dumontierlab.com/RAXCvEZfCcjYuH5DWOIujBehGQt61y_nRHWssw9u6aYig - http://rdf.disgenet.org/nanopub-server/RAXCvEZfCcjYuH5DWOIujBehGQt61y_nRHWssw9u6aYig - https://np.knowledgepixels.com/RAXCvEZfCcjYuH5DWOIujBehGQt61y_nRHWssw9u6aYig And you can query it at all these places (and more): - https://query.np.trustyuri.net/tools/full/yasgui.html#query=SELECT+%3Fs+%3Fp+%3Fo+WHERE+%7B+GRAPH+%3Chttps%3A%2F%2Fw3id.org%2Fnp%2FRAXCvEZfCcjYuH5DWOIujBehGQt61y_nRHWssw9u6aYig%23assertion%3E+%7B+%3Fs+%3Fp+%3Fo+%7D+%7D+&contentTypeConstruct=text%2Fturtle&contentTypeSelect=application%2Fsparql-results%2Bjson&endpoint=%2Frepo%2Ffull&requestMethod=POST&tabTitle=Query&headers=%7B%7D&outputFormat=table - https://nanopub.sdsc.edu/tools/full/yasgui.html#query=SELECT+%3Fs+%3Fp+%3Fo+WHERE+%7B+GRAPH+%3Chttps%3A%2F%2Fw3id.org%2Fnp%2FRAXCvEZfCcjYuH5DWOIujBehGQt61y_nRHWssw9u6aYig%23assertion%3E+%7B+%3Fs+%3Fp+%3Fo+%7D+%7D+&contentTypeConstruct=text%2Fturtle&contentTypeSelect=application%2Fsparql-results%2Bjson&endpoint=%2Frepo%2Ffull&requestMethod=POST&tabTitle=Query&headers=%7B%7D&outputFormat=table - https://query.np.kpxl.org/tools/full/yasgui.html#query=SELECT+%3Fs+%3Fp+%3Fo+WHERE+%7B+GRAPH+%3Chttps%3A%2F%2Fw3id.org%2Fnp%2FRAXCvEZfCcjYuH5DWOIujBehGQt61y_nRHWssw9u6aYig%23assertion%3E+%7B+%3Fs+%3Fp+%3Fo+%7D+%7D+&contentTypeConstruct=text%2Fturtle&contentTypeSelect=application%2Fsparql - https://query.knowledgepixels.com/tools/full/yasgui.html#query=SELECT+%3Fs+%3Fp+%3Fo+WHERE+%7B+GRAPH+%3Chttps%3A%2F%2Fw3id.org%2Fnp%2FRAXCvEZfCcjYuH5DWOIujBehGQt61y_nRHWssw9u6aYig%23assertion%3E+%7B+%3Fs+%3Fp+%3Fo+%7D+%7D+&contentTypeConstruct=text%2Fturtle&contentTypeSelect=application%2Fsparql Can you point me to any technology that is *less* silo than this? > there are reasons not to be optimistic about nanopubs (or text-mining in general) Nanopublications are *not* a special case of text mining. In fact, they were conceived to make sure we don't need text mining in the first place ("Why bury it first and then mine it again?"; see https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-6-142 ). > In other words, > [Helictopleurus dorbignyi] -> [isSynonymOf] -> [Helictopleurus halffteri] > This seems a fairly simple thing to say, ... Yes, it always looks simple until you dig into the details, and then it gets more complicated. This modeling was the result form extended discussions with people at Pensoft and other biodiversity experts. I might not be using the right domain terms here, but as you know, taxons have names and these names have URI-based identifiers even, but these names have often been used in different ways. So, the same names (even with identifiers) can refer to different taxon *concepts*. For these concepts, there aren't universally available and acceptable identifiers yet, unfortunately. But they can be constructed form a taxon name and a reference to a publication or "treatment" where this interpretation is explained. There are others who can explain better the domain side of this reasoning, which you can probably piece together from your own expertise in the domain, but that was how we arrived at this semantic model. > indeed we could say it with a single triple, but the corresponding nanopub requires 33 RDF triples to say this. 33 doesn't seem like a very large number to me. And I can explain in detail the purpose of every single one of these triples. Provenance and metadata are important, and they need a bit of space, that's all. > By itself this isn’t terribly useful because neither of the two taxa are “things” that have identifiers, they are blank nodes. Yes, but that's a result of the modeling decision above. Nanopublications as a technology don't force you to do it this way. > cannot have interoperability unless you use the same identifiers for the same things No, that's not true. We should indeed *minimize* the use of different identifiers for the same thing, but we can very well achieve interoperability with multiple identifiers. Approaches like linksets and scientific lenses, among others, can do this. We are working on concrete solutions for this within the nanopublication ecosystem too. On an open and distributed system like the Web, it's in fact *impossible* to enforce unique identifiers for the same things. You cannot prevent different people defining different identifiers for the same thing at different ends of the Web, and it has actually happened many many times, so we have to deal with this whether we want to or not. > That means persistent identifiers, identifiers that you have some confidence will be around in ten, 20, or 50 years (at least). That's a completely separate issue from the previous sentence. Yes, but what does "to be around" mean? Will catalogueoflife.org still be up in 2074? We don't know! But we can design systems where this doesn't even matter. What matters is that we can keep using the identifier and have an agreement of what it means. And you can do that with nanopublications and their ecosystem, and we are working on the concrete methods and tools. > I find it alarming that the link to the source of the statement that these two names are synonyms is not the DOI for the paper 10.3897/BDJ.12.e120304, No need to be alarmed. But yes, it should refer to the DOI and this should be fixed. We are looking into it with Pensoft. The reason is that this nanopublication was created before the DOI was minted. And the last step of making final versions of nanopublications upon formal article publication isn't fully developed yet. We have a long journey ahead of us, so we decided to move fast and allow ourselves to make mistakes on the way. This is one of them and it will be fixed. > The taxon names have as their identifiers https://www.checklistbank.org/dataset/9880/taxon/3K9T4 and https://www.checklistbank.org/dataset/9880/taxon/3K9ST. These identifiers are also local to a particular dataset. Why not use identifiers such as the Catalogue of Life entries for these names (i.e., e.g. https://www.catalogueoflife.org/data/taxon/3K9T4, Checklistbank has broader coverage and is therefore more universal, and includes Catalogueoflife. To me Checklistbank seemed at least as persistent and long-term as Catalogueoflife, so overall preferable, but I am not familiar with the details and policies behind these platforms. In any case, this is a just a modeling decision we made, which we could have just as well done differently. It just shows we can use any kind of URI-based identifier, and consequently some tools/people will sometimes make modeling mistakes, but that's part of the process. > This is nice, but where is the equivalent for linking the publication to the nanopub via its DOI, or the taxon names to the nanopub? It should and can be there. See my answer above. > For example, http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/NOMEN_0000285 is used to define the relation between. I confess it’s unclear to me why NOMEN_0000285 isn’t used to directly link the two ChecklistBank records, rather than the indirection via #subjtaxon and #objtaxon, given that is a relationship between names (isn’t it?). See above. > It amazes me how readily people create new ontologies We just defined terms where needed, and didn't necessarily group them together in ontologies, applying the thinking of "breaking things into nano-pieces" to ontologies and their terms, in a sense. > especially as in the wider world there is a trend towards one vocabuary to rule them all (schema.org). Not all trends are good. Just saying :) > I find it disheartening that the bulk of the information in a nanopub is administrivia about that nanopub. Again, it all has a purpose, which I can explain in more detail if you like. > I understand the desire to establish provenance and to cryptographically sign the information, but all this is of limited use if the actual scientific information is poorly expressed. This is a false dichotomy. Of course we want both: provenance/validity, as well as properly expressed assertions. Nanopublications don't tell you upfront which ontologies to use (so no conceptual silo) or how to formulate your statements, but then of course modeling mistakes can happen. There is no way to prevent that, but that doesn't mean the technology or the ecosystem is flawed. I hope these responses and clarifications are helpful. Tobias" assertion.
- comment-6484057602 comment "Except possibly some details on the order in which certain steps should be taken. We have focussed on the technology (but always with the users in the longer term in our mind), because the technology needs to be at a certain level of maturity to start doing actual things with it. How to represent scientific content as a knowledge graph has been studied academically, and to make the next step to move this to practice we need a suitable technology first. And now that the technology is "ready enough", we can start doing this, but we won't get it right on the first try. So, in my view, what you point out are valid points, but they are not fundamental shortcomings but rather practical mistakes and rough edges that are part of the process. Right, the last two query links were broken. Somehow they got truncated. I fixed the links in my post above, and now they should work. Indeed persistence isn't free. But for nanopublications, as long as we stay in the range of thousands to millions, the costs are actually small. In particular if we separate the storage/archiving from the querying layer, as we do, where only the first is crucial for persistence. Then the persistence is more of an organizational/coordination problem than a cost problem, and with a decentralized redunant network as we have it, this task can be distributed and managed at low cost (on university servers, for example). Maybe URIs don't always resolve, but there is always a well-defined procedure to find the nanopubs at other locations. Things change if we talk about hundreds of millions to billions of nanopublications and more. Given the versatility of nanopublications, it's possible we will get there. For this we need a model where the mass creators of nanopublications also carry the associated costs. We are working on next-generation nanopublication services that will allow for exactly that. Nodes in the nanopublication network can then assert restrictions and quotas on users and types of nanopublications they replicate/accept, and so for publishing large quantities one would have to convince (with money, probably) a few of the nodes to co-host the nanopublications. Just as a quick summary of these plans; happy to explain more. And it's great that your post has triggered these discussions. Thanks for that :)" assertion.
- comment-6484057602 comment "Thanks for your reply. Yes, we seem to be in agreement then :) Except possibly some details on the order in which certain steps should be taken. We have focussed on the technology (but always with the users in the longer term in our mind), because the technology needs to be at a certain level of maturity to start doing actual things with it. How to represent scientific content as a knowledge graph has been studied academically, and to make the next step to move this to practice we need a suitable technology first. And now that the technology is "ready enough", we can start doing this, but we won't get it right on the first try. So, in my view, what you point out are valid points, but they are not fundamental shortcomings but rather practical mistakes and rough edges that are part of the process. Right, the last two query links were broken. Somehow they got truncated. I fixed the links in my post above, and now they should work. Indeed persistence isn't free. But for nanopublications, as long as we stay in the range of thousands to millions, the costs are actually small. In particular if we separate the storage/archiving from the querying layer, as we do, where only the first is crucial for persistence. Then the persistence is more of an organizational/coordination problem than a cost problem, and with a decentralized redunant network as we have it, this task can be distributed and managed at low cost (on university servers, for example). Maybe URIs don't always resolve, but there is always a well-defined procedure to find the nanopubs at other locations. Things change if we talk about hundreds of millions to billions of nanopublications and more. Given the versatility of nanopublications, it's possible we will get there. For this we need a model where the mass creators of nanopublications also carry the associated costs. We are working on next-generation nanopublication services that will allow for exactly that. Nodes in the nanopublication network can then assert restrictions and quotas on users and types of nanopublications they replicate/accept, and so for publishing large quantities one would have to convince (with money, probably) a few of the nodes to co-host the nanopublications. Just as a quick summary of these plans; happy to explain more. And it's great that your post has triggered these discussions. Thanks for that :)" assertion.
- comment-6484057602 comment "Thanks for your reply. Yes, we seem to be in agreement then :) Except possibly some details on the order in which certain steps should be taken. We have focussed on the technology (but always with the users in the longer term in our mind), because the technology needs to be at a certain level of maturity to start doing actual things with it. How to represent scientific content as a knowledge graph has been studied academically, and to make the next step to move this to practice we need a suitable technology first. And now that the technology is "ready enough", we can start doing this, but we won't get it right on the first try. So, in my view, what you point out are valid points, but they are not fundamental shortcomings but rather practical mistakes and rough edges that are part of the process. Right, the last two query links were broken. Somehow they got truncated. I fixed the links in my post above, and now they should work. Indeed persistence isn't free. But for nanopublications, as long as we stay in the range of thousands to millions, the costs are actually small. In particular if we separate the storage/archiving from the querying layer, as we do, where only the first is crucial for persistence. Then the persistence is more of an organizational/coordination problem than a cost problem, and with a decentralized redundant network as we have it, this task can be distributed and managed at low cost (on university servers, for example). Maybe URIs don't always resolve, but there is always a well-defined procedure to find the nanopubs at other locations. Things change if we talk about hundreds of millions to billions of nanopublications and more. Given the versatility of nanopublications, it's possible we will get there. For this we need a model where the mass creators of nanopublications also carry the associated costs. We are working on next-generation nanopublication services that will allow for exactly that. Nodes in the nanopublication network can then assert restrictions and quotas on users and types of nanopublications they replicate/accept, and so for publishing large quantities one would have to convince (with money, probably) a few of the nodes to co-host the nanopublications. Just as a quick summary of these plans; happy to explain more. And it's great that your post has triggered these discussions. Thanks for that :)" assertion.
- OpenAIRE comment "OpenAIRE AMKE is a non-profit organization with a mission to promote open scholarship and improve discoverability, accessibility, shareability, reusability, reproducibility, and monitoring of data-driven research results, globally. The organization operates a European e-infrastructure offering a diverse set of public services to accelerate the adoption of Open Science and is supported by a network of experts placed in key national organizations across European countries, the National Open Access Desks. The users of OpenAIRE services include researchers, research communities, policy makers, research-intensive organizations, SMEs, universities, libraries, and citizen scientists. OpenAIRE is a key implementer of the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC)." assertion.
- OpenAIRE-Guidelines-for-Literature-Managers-v4 comment "The OpenAIRE Guidelines for Literature Repository Managers 4.0 provide orientation for repository managers to define and implement their local data management policies according to the requirements of the OpenAIRE - Open Access Infrastructure for Research in Europe." assertion.
- assertion comment "Language models != world models "Probing Multimodal LLMs as World Models for Driving" https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.05956" assertion.
- isidore comment "ISIDORE is a search engine providing access to digital data from the Humanities and Social Sciences (SSH). Open to all and in particular to teachers, researchers, PhD students and students, it is based on the principles of Linked Data and provides open access to data." assertion.
- COAR comment "COAR is an international association that brings together individual repositories and repository networks in order to build capacity, align policies and practices, and act as a global voice for the repository community." assertion.