Nanopublications LDF server

Matches in Nanopublications for { ?s <http://purl.org/spar/cito/obtainsSupportFrom> ?o ?g. }

• Of%2019%20inanimate%20datives%2C%2015%20tokens%20%28or%2079%25%29%20show%20a%20very%20strong%20preference%20for%20the%20Nom-Dat%20order%20and%20four%20tokens%20%28or%2021%25%29%20for%20the%20Dat-Nom%20order. obtainsSupportFrom S0332586524000039 assertion.
• Of%2019%20inanimate%20datives%2C%2015%20tokens%20%28or%2079%25%29%20show%20a%20very%20strong%20preference%20for%20the%20Nom-Dat%20order%20and%20four%20tokens%20%28or%2021%25%29%20for%20the%20Dat-Nom%20order. obtainsSupportFrom JXMG1M assertion.
• Three%20variables%20that%20were%20also%20identified%20as%20strong%20predictors%20in%20the%20first%20regression%20model%20are%20nominative%20case%20marking%2C%20indefiniteness%2C%20and%20length%20%28coefficients%201.16%2C%20-1.15%2C%20and%20-0.54%2C%20respectively%29. obtainsSupportFrom S0332586524000039 assertion.
• Three%20variables%20that%20were%20also%20identified%20as%20strong%20predictors%20in%20the%20first%20regression%20model%20are%20nominative%20case%20marking%2C%20indefiniteness%2C%20and%20length%20%28coefficients%201.16%2C%20-1.15%2C%20and%20-0.54%2C%20respectively%29. obtainsSupportFrom JXMG1M assertion.
• Nominative%20case%20marking%2C%20indefiniteness%2C%20and%20length%20correspond%20to%20a%2029%25%20increase%2C%20a%2028.8%25%20decrease%2C%20and%20a%2013.5%25%20decrease%2C%20respectively%2C%20in%20the%20likelihood%20of%20switching%20from%20the%20second%20to%20the%20first%20argument%20slot. obtainsSupportFrom S0332586524000039 assertion.
• Nominative%20case%20marking%2C%20indefiniteness%2C%20and%20length%20correspond%20to%20a%2029%25%20increase%2C%20a%2028.8%25%20decrease%2C%20and%20a%2013.5%25%20decrease%2C%20respectively%2C%20in%20the%20likelihood%20of%20switching%20from%20the%20second%20to%20the%20first%20argument%20slot. obtainsSupportFrom JXMG1M assertion.
• For%20alternating%20verbs%2C%20the%20Nom-Dat%20case%20frame%20is%20attested%20more%20frequently%20than%20the%20Dat-Nom%20case%20frame%2C%20or%20in%2072%25%20vs.%2028%25%20of%20the%20cases%20when%20considering%20full%20NPs. obtainsSupportFrom S0332586524000039 assertion.
• For%20alternating%20verbs%2C%20the%20Nom-Dat%20case%20frame%20is%20attested%20more%20frequently%20than%20the%20Dat-Nom%20case%20frame%2C%20or%20in%2072%25%20vs.%2028%25%20of%20the%20cases%20when%20considering%20full%20NPs. obtainsSupportFrom JXMG1M assertion.
• Excluding%20the%20verb%20henta%2C%20the%20distribution%20amounts%20to%2054%25%20Nom-Dat%20vs.%2046%25%20Dat-Nom%20for%20full%20NPs. obtainsSupportFrom S0332586524000039 assertion.
• Excluding%20the%20verb%20henta%2C%20the%20distribution%20amounts%20to%2054%25%20Nom-Dat%20vs.%2046%25%20Dat-Nom%20for%20full%20NPs. obtainsSupportFrom JXMG1M assertion.
• The%20nominative-first%20effect%20with%20two%20pronouns%20is%20a%20consequence%20of%20length%20since%20preverbal%20nominative%20pronouns%20have%20an%20average%20length%20of%201.1%20words%2C%20while%20postverbal%20dative%20pronouns%20have%20an%20average%20length%20of%201.9%20words. obtainsSupportFrom S0332586524000039 assertion.
• The%20nominative-first%20effect%20with%20two%20pronouns%20is%20a%20consequence%20of%20length%20since%20preverbal%20nominative%20pronouns%20have%20an%20average%20length%20of%201.1%20words%2C%20while%20postverbal%20dative%20pronouns%20have%20an%20average%20length%20of%201.9%20words. obtainsSupportFrom JXMG1M assertion.
• In%20the%20double-NP%20configuration%2C%2061%25%20of%20the%20nominatives%20in%20first%20position%20are%20definite. obtainsSupportFrom S0332586524000039 assertion.
• In%20the%20double-NP%20configuration%2C%2061%25%20of%20the%20nominatives%20in%20first%20position%20are%20definite. obtainsSupportFrom JXMG1M assertion.
• Que%20dalle%20predominantly%20occurs%20in%20the%20dependent%20structure%20where%20it%20can%20be%20direct%20object%20and%20subject%20albeit%20always%20in%20a%20repeated%20sequence. obtainsSupportFrom S0959269525000067 assertion.
• Que%20dalle%20predominantly%20occurs%20in%20the%20dependent%20structure%20where%20it%20can%20be%20direct%20object%20and%20subject%20albeit%20always%20in%20a%20repeated%20sequence. obtainsSupportFrom HFIYF3 assertion.
• Que%20dalle%20can%20also%20be%20used%20in%20a%20prepositional%20phrase%2C%20as%20subject%20complement%2C%20and%20can%20be%20post-determinated%20by%20a%20PP. obtainsSupportFrom S0959269525000067 assertion.
• Que%20dalle%20can%20also%20be%20used%20in%20a%20prepositional%20phrase%2C%20as%20subject%20complement%2C%20and%20can%20be%20post-determinated%20by%20a%20PP. obtainsSupportFrom HFIYF3 assertion.
• Que%20dalle%20functions%20as%20an%20attributive%20adjective%2C%20unlike%20rien. obtainsSupportFrom S0959269525000067 assertion.
• Que%20dalle%20functions%20as%20an%20attributive%20adjective%2C%20unlike%20rien. obtainsSupportFrom HFIYF3 assertion.
• Que%20dalle%20exhibits%20ne-deletion%20in%2067%25%20of%20cases%20in%20the%20corpus%20moderne%20and%2084%25%20in%20the%20corpus%20contemporain. obtainsSupportFrom S0959269525000067 assertion.
• Que%20dalle%20exhibits%20ne-deletion%20in%2067%25%20of%20cases%20in%20the%20corpus%20moderne%20and%2084%25%20in%20the%20corpus%20contemporain. obtainsSupportFrom HFIYF3 assertion.
• The%20expression%20que%20dalle%20is%20particularly%20frequent%20with%20cognition%20verbs%2C%20value%20verbs%2C%20verbs%20of%20perception%2C%20and%20existence%20verbs. obtainsSupportFrom S0959269525000067 assertion.
• The%20expression%20que%20dalle%20is%20particularly%20frequent%20with%20cognition%20verbs%2C%20value%20verbs%2C%20verbs%20of%20perception%2C%20and%20existence%20verbs. obtainsSupportFrom HFIYF3 assertion.
• Que%20dalle%20can%20replace%20rien%20in%20most%20distributional%20contexts%2C%20including%20idiomatic%20expressions%20like%20%27trois%20fois%20que%20dalle%27. obtainsSupportFrom S0959269525000067 assertion.
• Que%20dalle%20can%20replace%20rien%20in%20most%20distributional%20contexts%2C%20including%20idiomatic%20expressions%20like%20%27trois%20fois%20que%20dalle%27. obtainsSupportFrom HFIYF3 assertion.
• Que%20dalle%20differs%20from%20rien%20syntactically%3A%20it%20cannot%20occur%20in%20sentence-initial%20subject%20position%20and%20always%20appears%20in%20repeated%20sequences%20with%20synonyms%20when%20used%20as%20a%20subject. obtainsSupportFrom S0959269525000067 assertion.
• Que%20dalle%20differs%20from%20rien%20syntactically%3A%20it%20cannot%20occur%20in%20sentence-initial%20subject%20position%20and%20always%20appears%20in%20repeated%20sequences%20with%20synonyms%20when%20used%20as%20a%20subject. obtainsSupportFrom HFIYF3 assertion.
• Que%20dalle%20is%20used%20as%20a%20pragmatic%20marker%20conveying%20indignation%2C%20refusal%2C%20or%20emphasis%20of%20zero%20quantification. obtainsSupportFrom S0959269525000067 assertion.
• Que%20dalle%20is%20used%20as%20a%20pragmatic%20marker%20conveying%20indignation%2C%20refusal%2C%20or%20emphasis%20of%20zero%20quantification. obtainsSupportFrom HFIYF3 assertion.
• The%20earliest%20attestation%20of%20que%20dalle%20dates%20from%201942%20in%20the%20Frantext%20corpus%2C%20while%20its%20predecessor%20form%20%27que%20le%20dail%27%20dates%20from%201829. obtainsSupportFrom S0959269525000067 assertion.
• The%20earliest%20attestation%20of%20que%20dalle%20dates%20from%201942%20in%20the%20Frantext%20corpus%2C%20while%20its%20predecessor%20form%20%27que%20le%20dail%27%20dates%20from%201829. obtainsSupportFrom HFIYF3 assertion.
• Que%20dalle%20originates%20in%20the%20exceptive%20structure%20%27ne%3A%3A%3Aque%27%20but%20corpus%20data%20are%20insufficient%20to%20demonstrate%20this%20assumption. obtainsSupportFrom S0959269525000067 assertion.
• Que%20dalle%20originates%20in%20the%20exceptive%20structure%20%27ne%3A%3A%3Aque%27%20but%20corpus%20data%20are%20insufficient%20to%20demonstrate%20this%20assumption. obtainsSupportFrom HFIYF3 assertion.
• The%20development%20of%20que%20dalle%20involves%20lexicalization%20and%20grammaticalization%20processes%2C%20including%20desemanticization%20and%20erosion%20of%20the%20form. obtainsSupportFrom S0959269525000067 assertion.
• The%20development%20of%20que%20dalle%20involves%20lexicalization%20and%20grammaticalization%20processes%2C%20including%20desemanticization%20and%20erosion%20of%20the%20form. obtainsSupportFrom HFIYF3 assertion.
• Que%20dalle%20differs%20from%20rien%20in%20its%20postverbal%20use%20as%20a%20subject%20and%20tends%20toward%20inherent%20negativity%20in%20fragment%20answers. obtainsSupportFrom S0959269525000067 assertion.
• Que%20dalle%20differs%20from%20rien%20in%20its%20postverbal%20use%20as%20a%20subject%20and%20tends%20toward%20inherent%20negativity%20in%20fragment%20answers. obtainsSupportFrom HFIYF3 assertion.
• Que%20dalle%20exhibits%20features%20of%20pragmatic%20markers%3A%20multifunctionality%2C%20subjectification%2C%20and%20stylistic%2Fsociolinguistic%20characteristics%20of%20informal%20discourse. obtainsSupportFrom S0959269525000067 assertion.
• Que%20dalle%20exhibits%20features%20of%20pragmatic%20markers%3A%20multifunctionality%2C%20subjectification%2C%20and%20stylistic%2Fsociolinguistic%20characteristics%20of%20informal%20discourse. obtainsSupportFrom HFIYF3 assertion.
• SSE%20is%20much%20more%20likely%20to%20employ%20NEED%20TO%20for%20the%20expression%20of%20strong%20obligation%2C%20and%20less%20likely%20to%20employ%20MUST%20and%20%28HAVE%29%20GOT%20TO. obtainsSupportFrom S1360674321000071 assertion.
• SSE%20is%20much%20more%20likely%20to%20employ%20NEED%20TO%20for%20the%20expression%20of%20strong%20obligation%2C%20and%20less%20likely%20to%20employ%20MUST%20and%20%28HAVE%29%20GOT%20TO. obtainsSupportFrom GIP0PM assertion.
• In%20speech%2C%20the%20preferred%20verb%20in%20both%20SSE%20and%20SBSE%20is%20HAVE%20TO%2C%20but%20NEED%20TO%20is%20used%20at%20rates%20of%2033.1%25%20in%20SSE%20and%2010.6%25%20in%20SBSE. obtainsSupportFrom S1360674321000071 assertion.
• In%20speech%2C%20the%20preferred%20verb%20in%20both%20SSE%20and%20SBSE%20is%20HAVE%20TO%2C%20but%20NEED%20TO%20is%20used%20at%20rates%20of%2033.1%25%20in%20SSE%20and%2010.6%25%20in%20SBSE. obtainsSupportFrom GIP0PM assertion.
• In%20writing%2C%20MUST%20is%20used%20at%2038.4%25%20in%20SBSE%20compared%20to%2019.9%25%20in%20SSE. obtainsSupportFrom S1360674321000071 assertion.
• In%20writing%2C%20MUST%20is%20used%20at%2038.4%25%20in%20SBSE%20compared%20to%2019.9%25%20in%20SSE. obtainsSupportFrom GIP0PM assertion.
• Subjective%20deontic%20sources%20of%20obligation%20correlate%20positively%20with%20higher%20rates%20of%20MUST%20and%20NEED%20TO%2C%20while%20objective%20deontic%20sources%20correlate%20with%20HAVE%20TO%20in%20both%20varieties. obtainsSupportFrom S1360674321000071 assertion.
• Subjective%20deontic%20sources%20of%20obligation%20correlate%20positively%20with%20higher%20rates%20of%20MUST%20and%20NEED%20TO%2C%20while%20objective%20deontic%20sources%20correlate%20with%20HAVE%20TO%20in%20both%20varieties. obtainsSupportFrom GIP0PM assertion.
• MUST%20tends%20to%20be%20used%20less%20with%20subjects%20in%20the%20second%20person%2C%20whereas%20HAVE%20TO%20is%20used%20more%20in%20this%20context%20in%20both%20SSE%20and%20SBSE. obtainsSupportFrom S1360674321000071 assertion.
• MUST%20tends%20to%20be%20used%20less%20with%20subjects%20in%20the%20second%20person%2C%20whereas%20HAVE%20TO%20is%20used%20more%20in%20this%20context%20in%20both%20SSE%20and%20SBSE. obtainsSupportFrom GIP0PM assertion.
• The%20presence%20of%20a%20negative%20marker%20in%20the%20complement%20clause%20increases%20the%20preference%20for%20finite%20patterns%20across%20all%20varieties%20of%20English. obtainsSupportFrom S1360674321000241 assertion.
• The%20presence%20of%20a%20negative%20marker%20in%20the%20complement%20clause%20increases%20the%20preference%20for%20finite%20patterns%20across%20all%20varieties%20of%20English. obtainsSupportFrom CSQ4ZF assertion.
• Negation%20has%20a%20stronger%20effect%20on%20the%20alternation%20between%20finite%20and%20nonfinite%20complement%20clauses%20in%20L2%20varieties%20of%20English%20than%20in%20L1%20varieties. obtainsSupportFrom S1360674321000241 assertion.
• Negation%20has%20a%20stronger%20effect%20on%20the%20alternation%20between%20finite%20and%20nonfinite%20complement%20clauses%20in%20L2%20varieties%20of%20English%20than%20in%20L1%20varieties. obtainsSupportFrom CSQ4ZF assertion.
• No-negation%20has%20a%20stronger%20effect%20on%20the%20choice%20of%20finite%20complement%20clauses%20than%20not-negation. obtainsSupportFrom S1360674321000241 assertion.
• No-negation%20has%20a%20stronger%20effect%20on%20the%20choice%20of%20finite%20complement%20clauses%20than%20not-negation. obtainsSupportFrom CSQ4ZF assertion.
• No-negation%20increases%20the%20preference%20for%20the%20use%20of%20the%20complementizer%20%27that%27%20in%20finite%20clauses%20compared%20to%20not-negation. obtainsSupportFrom S1360674321000241 assertion.
• No-negation%20increases%20the%20preference%20for%20the%20use%20of%20the%20complementizer%20%27that%27%20in%20finite%20clauses%20compared%20to%20not-negation. obtainsSupportFrom CSQ4ZF assertion.
• L2%20varieties%20of%20English%20exhibit%20a%20stronger%20overall%20preference%20for%20finite%20clauses%20compared%20to%20L1%20varieties. obtainsSupportFrom S1360674321000241 assertion.
• L2%20varieties%20of%20English%20exhibit%20a%20stronger%20overall%20preference%20for%20finite%20clauses%20compared%20to%20L1%20varieties. obtainsSupportFrom CSQ4ZF assertion.
• The%20previously%20reported%20general%20effects%20of%20the%20tense%20of%20try%2C%20mode%20and%20horror%20aequi%20are%20corroborated%20across%20native%20varieties%20of%20English. obtainsSupportFrom S1360674321000393 assertion.
• The%20previously%20reported%20general%20effects%20of%20the%20tense%20of%20try%2C%20mode%20and%20horror%20aequi%20are%20corroborated%20across%20native%20varieties%20of%20English. obtainsSupportFrom GVUZWI assertion.
• Following%20Latin-based%20infinitives%20favor%20try%20to%20in%20most%20varieties%2C%20especially%20in%20writing. obtainsSupportFrom S1360674321000393 assertion.
• Following%20Latin-based%20infinitives%20favor%20try%20to%20in%20most%20varieties%2C%20especially%20in%20writing. obtainsSupportFrom GVUZWI assertion.
• North%20American%20varieties%20show%20a%20near%20default%20choice%20for%20try%20to%2C%20neutralizing%20the%20contextual%2Fregister%20distinction%20for%20the%20alternation. obtainsSupportFrom S1360674321000393 assertion.
• North%20American%20varieties%20show%20a%20near%20default%20choice%20for%20try%20to%2C%20neutralizing%20the%20contextual%2Fregister%20distinction%20for%20the%20alternation. obtainsSupportFrom GVUZWI assertion.
• Try%20and%20is%20highly%20conventionalized%20in%20British%2C%20Irish%2C%20Australian%2C%20and%20New%20Zealand%20speech. obtainsSupportFrom S1360674321000393 assertion.
• Try%20and%20is%20highly%20conventionalized%20in%20British%2C%20Irish%2C%20Australian%2C%20and%20New%20Zealand%20speech. obtainsSupportFrom GVUZWI assertion.
• An%20ensuing%20Latinate%20infinitive%20enhances%20the%20preference%20for%20try%20to%2C%20mitigating%20overall%20cross-varietal%20preferences%20for%20try%20and%20in%20informal%20contexts. obtainsSupportFrom S1360674321000393 assertion.
• An%20ensuing%20Latinate%20infinitive%20enhances%20the%20preference%20for%20try%20to%2C%20mitigating%20overall%20cross-varietal%20preferences%20for%20try%20and%20in%20informal%20contexts. obtainsSupportFrom GVUZWI assertion.
• The%20effect%20of%20horror%20aequi%20is%20minimized%20in%20North%20American%20varieties%20due%20to%20the%20high%20conventionalization%20of%20try%20to. obtainsSupportFrom S1360674321000393 assertion.
• The%20effect%20of%20horror%20aequi%20is%20minimized%20in%20North%20American%20varieties%20due%20to%20the%20high%20conventionalization%20of%20try%20to. obtainsSupportFrom GVUZWI assertion.
• The%20stress%20pattern%20and%20initial%20sound%20of%20the%20following%20infinitive%20influence%20the%20particle%20alternation%20with%20polysyllabic%2C%20post-first-syllable%20stressed%20verbs%20favoring%20try%20to. obtainsSupportFrom S1360674321000393 assertion.
• The%20stress%20pattern%20and%20initial%20sound%20of%20the%20following%20infinitive%20influence%20the%20particle%20alternation%20with%20polysyllabic%2C%20post-first-syllable%20stressed%20verbs%20favoring%20try%20to. obtainsSupportFrom GVUZWI assertion.
• Particle%20placement%20after%20bare-form%20try%20is%20conditioned%20by%20a%20combination%20of%20syntactic%2C%20semantic%2C%20and%20probabilistic%20factors%20in%20native%20varieties%20of%20English. obtainsSupportFrom S1360674321000393 assertion.
• Particle%20placement%20after%20bare-form%20try%20is%20conditioned%20by%20a%20combination%20of%20syntactic%2C%20semantic%2C%20and%20probabilistic%20factors%20in%20native%20varieties%20of%20English. obtainsSupportFrom GVUZWI assertion.
• The%20particle%20is%20more%20likely%20to%20occur%20in%20its%20default%20post-verbal%20position%20when%20the%20following%20constituent%20is%20a%20noun%20phrase%20rather%20than%20a%20clause. obtainsSupportFrom S1360674321000393 assertion.
• The%20particle%20is%20more%20likely%20to%20occur%20in%20its%20default%20post-verbal%20position%20when%20the%20following%20constituent%20is%20a%20noun%20phrase%20rather%20than%20a%20clause. obtainsSupportFrom GVUZWI assertion.
• The%20semantic%20content%20of%20the%20verb%20phrase%20influences%20particle%20placement%2C%20with%20agentive%20and%20concrete%20events%20favoring%20the%20default%20post-verbal%20position. obtainsSupportFrom S1360674321000393 assertion.
• The%20semantic%20content%20of%20the%20verb%20phrase%20influences%20particle%20placement%2C%20with%20agentive%20and%20concrete%20events%20favoring%20the%20default%20post-verbal%20position. obtainsSupportFrom GVUZWI assertion.
• Probabilistic%20expectations%2C%20as%20measured%20by%20collostruction%20strength%2C%20play%20a%20role%20in%20particle%20placement%20after%20bare-form%20try. obtainsSupportFrom S1360674321000393 assertion.
• Probabilistic%20expectations%2C%20as%20measured%20by%20collostruction%20strength%2C%20play%20a%20role%20in%20particle%20placement%20after%20bare-form%20try. obtainsSupportFrom GVUZWI assertion.
• Variation%20in%20particle%20placement%20after%20bare-form%20try%20exhibits%20systematic%20differences%20across%20native%20varieties%20of%20English%2C%20including%20British%2C%20American%2C%20and%20Australian%20English. obtainsSupportFrom S1360674321000393 assertion.
• Variation%20in%20particle%20placement%20after%20bare-form%20try%20exhibits%20systematic%20differences%20across%20native%20varieties%20of%20English%2C%20including%20British%2C%20American%2C%20and%20Australian%20English. obtainsSupportFrom GVUZWI assertion.
• The%20alternation%20of%20particle%20placement%20after%20bare-form%20try%20is%20constrained%20by%20information%20density%2C%20with%20heavier%20constituents%20favoring%20the%20postposed%20position. obtainsSupportFrom S1360674321000393 assertion.
• The%20alternation%20of%20particle%20placement%20after%20bare-form%20try%20is%20constrained%20by%20information%20density%2C%20with%20heavier%20constituents%20favoring%20the%20postposed%20position. obtainsSupportFrom GVUZWI assertion.
• Unreduced%20words%20are%20recognized%20more%20accurately%20than%20reduced%20words%20in%20casual%20speech. obtainsSupportFrom S1366728925000021 assertion.
• Unreduced%20words%20are%20recognized%20more%20accurately%20than%20reduced%20words%20in%20casual%20speech. obtainsSupportFrom OHP3O3 assertion.
• Unreduced%20words%20are%20recognized%20more%20quickly%20than%20reduced%20words%20in%20lexical%20decision%20tasks. obtainsSupportFrom S1366728925000021 assertion.
• Unreduced%20words%20are%20recognized%20more%20quickly%20than%20reduced%20words%20in%20lexical%20decision%20tasks. obtainsSupportFrom OHP3O3 assertion.
• L1%20English%20listeners%20outperform%20L2%20listeners%20in%20transcription%20accuracy%20of%20target%20words. obtainsSupportFrom S1366728925000021 assertion.
• L1%20English%20listeners%20outperform%20L2%20listeners%20in%20transcription%20accuracy%20of%20target%20words. obtainsSupportFrom OHP3O3 assertion.
• The%20effect%20of%20phonetic%20reduction%20on%20intelligibility%20is%20larger%20for%20L2%20listeners%20compared%20to%20L1%20listeners. obtainsSupportFrom S1366728925000021 assertion.
• The%20effect%20of%20phonetic%20reduction%20on%20intelligibility%20is%20larger%20for%20L2%20listeners%20compared%20to%20L1%20listeners. obtainsSupportFrom OHP3O3 assertion.
• There%20is%20no%20differential%20effect%20of%20phonetic%20reduction%20on%20word%20recognition%20between%20Dutch-speaking%20and%20Spanish-speaking%20L2%20listeners. obtainsSupportFrom S1366728925000021 assertion.
• There%20is%20no%20differential%20effect%20of%20phonetic%20reduction%20on%20word%20recognition%20between%20Dutch-speaking%20and%20Spanish-speaking%20L2%20listeners. obtainsSupportFrom OHP3O3 assertion.
• Speakers%20with%20General%20British%20or%20Newcastle%20accents%20are%20more%20intelligible%20than%20speakers%20with%20a%20French%20accent%20for%20L1%20and%20L2%20listeners. obtainsSupportFrom S1366728925000021 assertion.
• Speakers%20with%20General%20British%20or%20Newcastle%20accents%20are%20more%20intelligible%20than%20speakers%20with%20a%20French%20accent%20for%20L1%20and%20L2%20listeners. obtainsSupportFrom OHP3O3 assertion.
• No%20over-additive%20effect%20of%20phonetic%20reduction%20and%20speaker%20accents%20on%20intelligibility%20was%20observed. obtainsSupportFrom S1366728925000021 assertion.
• No%20over-additive%20effect%20of%20phonetic%20reduction%20and%20speaker%20accents%20on%20intelligibility%20was%20observed. obtainsSupportFrom OHP3O3 assertion.

• first
• previous
• next