Nanopublications LDF server

Matches in Nanopublications for { ?s <http://purl.org/spar/cito/obtainsSupportFrom> ?o ?g. }

• The%20presence%20of%20charged%20dust%20narrows%20the%20width%20of%20the%20incoherent%20scatter%20spectrum%20and%20increases%20the%20central%20amplitude. obtainsSupportFrom S0022377821000866 assertion.
• The%20presence%20of%20charged%20dust%20narrows%20the%20width%20of%20the%20incoherent%20scatter%20spectrum%20and%20increases%20the%20central%20amplitude. obtainsSupportFrom GHZIIY assertion.
• Assuming%20an%20average%20dust%20size%20provides%20a%20good%20result%20for%20steep%20size%20distributions%20but%20fails%20to%20describe%20the%20spectra%20for%20a%20flatter%20dust%20size%20distribution. obtainsSupportFrom S0022377821000866 assertion.
• Assuming%20an%20average%20dust%20size%20provides%20a%20good%20result%20for%20steep%20size%20distributions%20but%20fails%20to%20describe%20the%20spectra%20for%20a%20flatter%20dust%20size%20distribution. obtainsSupportFrom GHZIIY assertion.
• The%20spectral%20width%20does%20not%20vary%20significantly%20with%20dust%20density%20for%20small%20particles%2C%20but%20changes%20prominently%20for%20larger%20dust%20particles%20depending%20on%20the%20charge%20state. obtainsSupportFrom S0022377821000866 assertion.
• The%20spectral%20width%20does%20not%20vary%20significantly%20with%20dust%20density%20for%20small%20particles%2C%20but%20changes%20prominently%20for%20larger%20dust%20particles%20depending%20on%20the%20charge%20state. obtainsSupportFrom GHZIIY assertion.
• For%20small%20negative%20dust%20charge%20states%2C%20the%20spectrum%20is%20broad%20for%20low%20dust%20densities%20and%20narrows%20with%20increased%20density%3B%20for%20charge%20states%205%20and%20higher%2C%20the%20spectrum%20is%20generally%20narrow%20and%20width%20increases%20with%20density. obtainsSupportFrom S0022377821000866 assertion.
• For%20small%20negative%20dust%20charge%20states%2C%20the%20spectrum%20is%20broad%20for%20low%20dust%20densities%20and%20narrows%20with%20increased%20density%3B%20for%20charge%20states%205%20and%20higher%2C%20the%20spectrum%20is%20generally%20narrow%20and%20width%20increases%20with%20density. obtainsSupportFrom GHZIIY assertion.
• Below%2085%20km%2C%20the%20electron%20density%20for%20most%20days%20is%20less%20than%201000%20cm%5E-3%2C%20which%20is%20near%20the%20detection%20limit%20of%20EISCAT%20VHF%20radar. obtainsSupportFrom S0022377821000866 assertion.
• Below%2085%20km%2C%20the%20electron%20density%20for%20most%20days%20is%20less%20than%201000%20cm%5E-3%2C%20which%20is%20near%20the%20detection%20limit%20of%20EISCAT%20VHF%20radar. obtainsSupportFrom GHZIIY assertion.
• Spectral%20amplitude%20increases%20with%20decreasing%20temperature%2C%20while%20the%20width%20of%20the%20spectrum%20decreases. obtainsSupportFrom S0022377821000866 assertion.
• Spectral%20amplitude%20increases%20with%20decreasing%20temperature%2C%20while%20the%20width%20of%20the%20spectrum%20decreases. obtainsSupportFrom GHZIIY assertion.
• The%20spectral%20amplitude%20increases%20with%20increasing%20neutral%20density%3B%20the%20spectral%20width%20initially%20increases%20then%20decreases%20at%20higher%20densities. obtainsSupportFrom S0022377821000866 assertion.
• The%20spectral%20amplitude%20increases%20with%20increasing%20neutral%20density%3B%20the%20spectral%20width%20initially%20increases%20then%20decreases%20at%20higher%20densities. obtainsSupportFrom GHZIIY assertion.
• Positive%20dust%20influences%20the%20spectrum%20more%20than%20negative%20dust%2C%20particularly%20showing%20a%20narrowing%20effect%20on%20the%20spectral%20width. obtainsSupportFrom S0022377821000866 assertion.
• Positive%20dust%20influences%20the%20spectrum%20more%20than%20negative%20dust%2C%20particularly%20showing%20a%20narrowing%20effect%20on%20the%20spectral%20width. obtainsSupportFrom GHZIIY assertion.
• The%20charged%20dust%20in%20fluences%20the%20spectrum%20most%20significantly%20during%20the%20day%20at%20altitudes%20approximately%2070-80%20km%20for%20the%20EISCAT%20location. obtainsSupportFrom S0022377821000866 assertion.
• The%20charged%20dust%20in%20fluences%20the%20spectrum%20most%20significantly%20during%20the%20day%20at%20altitudes%20approximately%2070-80%20km%20for%20the%20EISCAT%20location. obtainsSupportFrom GHZIIY assertion.
• Detection%20of%20charged%20dust%20signatures%20is%20most%20favorable%20during%20winter%20under%20increased%20electron%20density%20conditions%20at%20altitudes%20below%2080%20km. obtainsSupportFrom S0022377821000866 assertion.
• Detection%20of%20charged%20dust%20signatures%20is%20most%20favorable%20during%20winter%20under%20increased%20electron%20density%20conditions%20at%20altitudes%20below%2080%20km. obtainsSupportFrom GHZIIY assertion.
• L2%20speakers%20are%20only%20sensitive%20to%20word%20order%20violations%20for%20sentences%20with%20gender-congruent%20nouns. obtainsSupportFrom S0142716422000236 assertion.
• L2%20speakers%20are%20only%20sensitive%20to%20word%20order%20violations%20for%20sentences%20with%20gender-congruent%20nouns. obtainsSupportFrom YUTP35 assertion.
• The%20detection%20of%20ungrammaticality%20for%20sentences%20containing%20gender-incongruent%20nouns%20only%20emerges%20at%20higher%20L2%20proficiency%20levels. obtainsSupportFrom S0142716422000236 assertion.
• The%20detection%20of%20ungrammaticality%20for%20sentences%20containing%20gender-incongruent%20nouns%20only%20emerges%20at%20higher%20L2%20proficiency%20levels. obtainsSupportFrom YUTP35 assertion.
• L2%20learners%20demonstrated%20earlier%20and%20stronger%20slowdowns%20for%20ungrammatical%20sentences%20comprising%20congruent%20as%20compared%20to%20incongruent%20nouns. obtainsSupportFrom S0142716422000236 assertion.
• L2%20learners%20demonstrated%20earlier%20and%20stronger%20slowdowns%20for%20ungrammatical%20sentences%20comprising%20congruent%20as%20compared%20to%20incongruent%20nouns. obtainsSupportFrom YUTP35 assertion.
• There%20were%20no%20significant%20differences%20in%20the%20processing%20of%20neuter%20nouns%20compared%20to%20incongruent%20nouns%20regarding%20grammaticality%20detection%20for%20L2%20learners. obtainsSupportFrom S0142716422000236 assertion.
• There%20were%20no%20significant%20differences%20in%20the%20processing%20of%20neuter%20nouns%20compared%20to%20incongruent%20nouns%20regarding%20grammaticality%20detection%20for%20L2%20learners. obtainsSupportFrom YUTP35 assertion.
• More%20highly%20proficient%20L2%20learners%20tend%20to%20demonstrate%20longer%20reading%20times%20on%20segment%204%20for%20ungrammatical%20versus%20grammatical%20sentences%20containing%20either%20incongruent%20or%20neuter%20nouns. obtainsSupportFrom S0142716422000236 assertion.
• More%20highly%20proficient%20L2%20learners%20tend%20to%20demonstrate%20longer%20reading%20times%20on%20segment%204%20for%20ungrammatical%20versus%20grammatical%20sentences%20containing%20either%20incongruent%20or%20neuter%20nouns. obtainsSupportFrom YUTP35 assertion.
• L1%20Spanish-L2%20German%20speakers%20show%20slower%20reading%20times%20for%20noun%20phrases%20with%20non-canonical%20%28scrambled%29%20adjective-noun%20word%20order%20in%20German%20compared%20to%20canonical%20word%20order. obtainsSupportFrom S0142716422000236 assertion.
• L1%20Spanish-L2%20German%20speakers%20show%20slower%20reading%20times%20for%20noun%20phrases%20with%20non-canonical%20%28scrambled%29%20adjective-noun%20word%20order%20in%20German%20compared%20to%20canonical%20word%20order. obtainsSupportFrom YUTP35 assertion.
• Gender%20congruency%20between%20L1%20Spanish%20and%20L2%20German%20facilitates%20L2%20sentence%20processing%20for%20Spanish-speaking%20learners%20of%20German. obtainsSupportFrom S0142716422000236 assertion.
• Gender%20congruency%20between%20L1%20Spanish%20and%20L2%20German%20facilitates%20L2%20sentence%20processing%20for%20Spanish-speaking%20learners%20of%20German. obtainsSupportFrom YUTP35 assertion.
• Spanish-speaking%20learners%20of%20German%20experience%20greater%20processing%20difficulty%20for%20nouns%20where%20Spanish%20and%20German%20grammatical%20gender%20differ%20%28e.g.%2C%20Spanish%20feminine-German%20neuter%29. obtainsSupportFrom S0142716422000236 assertion.
• Spanish-speaking%20learners%20of%20German%20experience%20greater%20processing%20difficulty%20for%20nouns%20where%20Spanish%20and%20German%20grammatical%20gender%20differ%20%28e.g.%2C%20Spanish%20feminine-German%20neuter%29. obtainsSupportFrom YUTP35 assertion.
• The%20interaction%20between%20lexical%20gender%20congruency%20and%20syntactic%20structure%20affects%20L2%20processing%20efficiency%20in%20L1%20Spanish-L2%20German%20speakers. obtainsSupportFrom S0142716422000236 assertion.
• The%20interaction%20between%20lexical%20gender%20congruency%20and%20syntactic%20structure%20affects%20L2%20processing%20efficiency%20in%20L1%20Spanish-L2%20German%20speakers. obtainsSupportFrom YUTP35 assertion.
• SEN%20variants%20are%20used%20in%20the%20RPR%20of%20Northern%20Norwegian%20children. obtainsSupportFrom S0332586520000219 assertion.
• SEN%20variants%20are%20used%20in%20the%20RPR%20of%20Northern%20Norwegian%20children. obtainsSupportFrom TU1GSY assertion.
• The%20rate%20of%20SEN%20variants%20varies%20across%20different%20morphological%20variables%20in%20RPR. obtainsSupportFrom S0332586520000219 assertion.
• The%20rate%20of%20SEN%20variants%20varies%20across%20different%20morphological%20variables%20in%20RPR. obtainsSupportFrom TU1GSY assertion.
• Children%20use%20standard%20variants%20of%20pronouns%20I%2C%20ME%2C%20YOU.SG%2C%20and%20REFL%20more%20consistently%20than%20other%20pronouns%20in%20RPR. obtainsSupportFrom S0332586520000219 assertion.
• Children%20use%20standard%20variants%20of%20pronouns%20I%2C%20ME%2C%20YOU.SG%2C%20and%20REFL%20more%20consistently%20than%20other%20pronouns%20in%20RPR. obtainsSupportFrom TU1GSY assertion.
• The%20rate%20of%20SEN%20variants%20in%20pronouns%20and%20BE%20increases%20significantly%20as%20children%20get%20older. obtainsSupportFrom S0332586520000219 assertion.
• The%20rate%20of%20SEN%20variants%20in%20pronouns%20and%20BE%20increases%20significantly%20as%20children%20get%20older. obtainsSupportFrom TU1GSY assertion.
• The%20rate%20of%20SEN%20in%20I%20for%20Lars-Lars%20increased%20from%2017.4%25%20in%20recordings%201-6%20to%2051.6%25%20in%20recordings%207-9%2C%2011-12%2C%2014%2C%20and%2069.6%25%20in%20recordings%2015-16%2C%2018%2C%2021%2C%2025%2C%2027. obtainsSupportFrom S0332586520000219 assertion.
• The%20rate%20of%20SEN%20in%20I%20for%20Lars-Lars%20increased%20from%2017.4%25%20in%20recordings%201-6%20to%2051.6%25%20in%20recordings%207-9%2C%2011-12%2C%2014%2C%20and%2069.6%25%20in%20recordings%2015-16%2C%2018%2C%2021%2C%2025%2C%2027. obtainsSupportFrom TU1GSY assertion.
• Celice%20consistently%20showed%20a%20high%20rate%20of%20SEN%20in%20I%2C%20averaging%2091.0%25%20across%20all%20recordings. obtainsSupportFrom S0332586520000219 assertion.
• Celice%20consistently%20showed%20a%20high%20rate%20of%20SEN%20in%20I%2C%20averaging%2091.0%25%20across%20all%20recordings. obtainsSupportFrom TU1GSY assertion.
• Morten%20exhibited%20an%2083.6%25%20rate%20of%20SEN%20in%20I%20across%20all%20recordings%20except%20in%20recordings%2015-16%2C%2018%2C%2021%2C%2025%2C%2027%2C%20where%20it%20reached%20100%25. obtainsSupportFrom S0332586520000219 assertion.
• Morten%20exhibited%20an%2083.6%25%20rate%20of%20SEN%20in%20I%20across%20all%20recordings%20except%20in%20recordings%2015-16%2C%2018%2C%2021%2C%2025%2C%2027%2C%20where%20it%20reached%20100%25. obtainsSupportFrom TU1GSY assertion.
• Inga%E2%80%99s%20rate%20of%20SEN%20in%20I%20increased%20from%2024%25%20in%20recordings%201-6%20to%2089%25%20in%20recordings%207-9%2C%2011-12%2C%2014. obtainsSupportFrom S0332586520000219 assertion.
• Inga%E2%80%99s%20rate%20of%20SEN%20in%20I%20increased%20from%2024%25%20in%20recordings%201-6%20to%2089%25%20in%20recordings%207-9%2C%2011-12%2C%2014. obtainsSupportFrom TU1GSY assertion.
• Hedda%20showed%20a%20low%20rate%20of%20SEN%20in%20I%20at%203.1%25%20across%20early%20recordings%2C%20which%20rose%20to%2079.4%25%20in%20later%20recordings. obtainsSupportFrom S0332586520000219 assertion.
• Hedda%20showed%20a%20low%20rate%20of%20SEN%20in%20I%20at%203.1%25%20across%20early%20recordings%2C%20which%20rose%20to%2079.4%25%20in%20later%20recordings. obtainsSupportFrom TU1GSY assertion.
• The%20rate%20of%20SEN%20in%20ME%20for%20Lars-Lars%20increased%20dramatically%20from%208.7%25%20in%20recordings%201-6%20to%2069.2%25%20in%20recordings%207-9%2C%2011-12%2C%2014. obtainsSupportFrom S0332586520000219 assertion.
• The%20rate%20of%20SEN%20in%20ME%20for%20Lars-Lars%20increased%20dramatically%20from%208.7%25%20in%20recordings%201-6%20to%2069.2%25%20in%20recordings%207-9%2C%2011-12%2C%2014. obtainsSupportFrom TU1GSY assertion.
• Celice%20had%20a%20high%20and%20increasing%20rate%20of%20SEN%20in%20ME%20from%2072.3%25%20in%20early%20recordings%20to%20100%25%20in%20later%20recordings. obtainsSupportFrom S0332586520000219 assertion.
• Celice%20had%20a%20high%20and%20increasing%20rate%20of%20SEN%20in%20ME%20from%2072.3%25%20in%20early%20recordings%20to%20100%25%20in%20later%20recordings. obtainsSupportFrom TU1GSY assertion.
• Morten%27s%20SEN%20rate%20for%20ME%20remained%20high%20across%20all%20recordings%20but%20peaked%20at%2095%25%20in%20recordings%207-9%2C%2011-12%2C%2014. obtainsSupportFrom S0332586520000219 assertion.
• Morten%27s%20SEN%20rate%20for%20ME%20remained%20high%20across%20all%20recordings%20but%20peaked%20at%2095%25%20in%20recordings%207-9%2C%2011-12%2C%2014. obtainsSupportFrom TU1GSY assertion.
• Kimbo%27s%20SEN%20rate%20in%20ME%20moved%20from%2072.7%25%20to%2086%25%20between%20early%20and%20later%20recordings. obtainsSupportFrom S0332586520000219 assertion.
• Kimbo%27s%20SEN%20rate%20in%20ME%20moved%20from%2072.7%25%20to%2086%25%20between%20early%20and%20later%20recordings. obtainsSupportFrom TU1GSY assertion.
• Klara%27s%20rate%20of%20SEN%20in%20ME%20varied%2C%20with%2045.6%25%20in%20early%20recordings%20and%20a%20peak%20of%2094.1%25%20in%20one%20segment%20but%20averaging%20around%2069.5%25. obtainsSupportFrom S0332586520000219 assertion.
• Klara%27s%20rate%20of%20SEN%20in%20ME%20varied%2C%20with%2045.6%25%20in%20early%20recordings%20and%20a%20peak%20of%2094.1%25%20in%20one%20segment%20but%20averaging%20around%2069.5%25. obtainsSupportFrom TU1GSY assertion.
• The%20SEN%20in%20YOU.SG%20rate%20for%20Lars-Lars%20increased%20from%2028.6%25%20in%20early%20recordings%20to%20100%25%20in%20later%20recordings. obtainsSupportFrom S0332586520000219 assertion.
• The%20SEN%20in%20YOU.SG%20rate%20for%20Lars-Lars%20increased%20from%2028.6%25%20in%20early%20recordings%20to%20100%25%20in%20later%20recordings. obtainsSupportFrom TU1GSY assertion.
• Celice%20demonstrated%20a%20high%20SEN%20rate%20in%20YOU.SG%20of%2085.7%25%20early%2C%20maintaining%20or%20exceeding%20this%20rate%20in%20subsequent%20recordings. obtainsSupportFrom S0332586520000219 assertion.
• Celice%20demonstrated%20a%20high%20SEN%20rate%20in%20YOU.SG%20of%2085.7%25%20early%2C%20maintaining%20or%20exceeding%20this%20rate%20in%20subsequent%20recordings. obtainsSupportFrom TU1GSY assertion.
• Morten%20maintained%20a%20consistently%20high%20SEN%20rate%20of%2087.5%25%20to%2096.6%25%20in%20YOU.SG%20throughout%20recordings. obtainsSupportFrom S0332586520000219 assertion.
• Morten%20maintained%20a%20consistently%20high%20SEN%20rate%20of%2087.5%25%20to%2096.6%25%20in%20YOU.SG%20throughout%20recordings. obtainsSupportFrom TU1GSY assertion.
• Inga%27s%20rate%20of%20SEN%20in%20YOU.SG%20dramatically%20increased%20from%2011%25%20to%20100%25%20across%20different%20recording%20segments. obtainsSupportFrom S0332586520000219 assertion.
• Inga%27s%20rate%20of%20SEN%20in%20YOU.SG%20dramatically%20increased%20from%2011%25%20to%20100%25%20across%20different%20recording%20segments. obtainsSupportFrom TU1GSY assertion.
• The%20SEN%20variant%20in%20YOU.PL%20was%20rare%20among%20subjects%2C%20with%20Lars-Lars%20expressing%20it%20at%20only%202.2%25%20across%20all%20recordings. obtainsSupportFrom S0332586520000219 assertion.
• The%20SEN%20variant%20in%20YOU.PL%20was%20rare%20among%20subjects%2C%20with%20Lars-Lars%20expressing%20it%20at%20only%202.2%25%20across%20all%20recordings. obtainsSupportFrom TU1GSY assertion.
• Kimbo%20had%20the%20highest%20overall%20SEN%20rate%20in%20YOU.PL%2C%20peaking%20at%2030%25%20across%20some%20recording%20segments. obtainsSupportFrom S0332586520000219 assertion.
• Kimbo%20had%20the%20highest%20overall%20SEN%20rate%20in%20YOU.PL%2C%20peaking%20at%2030%25%20across%20some%20recording%20segments. obtainsSupportFrom TU1GSY assertion.
• Lars-Lars%E2%80%99s%20rate%20of%20SEN%20in%20BE.PL%20increased%20from%207.1%25%20in%20early%20recordings%20to%2031.4%25%20in%20later%20ones. obtainsSupportFrom S0332586520000219 assertion.
• Lars-Lars%E2%80%99s%20rate%20of%20SEN%20in%20BE.PL%20increased%20from%207.1%25%20in%20early%20recordings%20to%2031.4%25%20in%20later%20ones. obtainsSupportFrom TU1GSY assertion.
• Individual%20rates%20of%20SEN%20in%20BE.PL%20varied%20greatly%2C%20with%20some%20subjects%20like%20Morten%20showing%20substantial%20increases%20in%20later%20recordings. obtainsSupportFrom S0332586520000219 assertion.
• Individual%20rates%20of%20SEN%20in%20BE.PL%20varied%20greatly%2C%20with%20some%20subjects%20like%20Morten%20showing%20substantial%20increases%20in%20later%20recordings. obtainsSupportFrom TU1GSY assertion.
• Alternating%20Dat-Nom%2FNom-Dat%20verbs%20in%20Icelandic%20instantiate%20the%20Nom-Dat%20construction%2054%25%20of%20the%20time%20and%20the%20Dat-Nom%20construction%2046%25%20of%20the%20time%20on%20average%20for%20four%20of%20five%20verbs%20when%20both%20arguments%20are%20full%20NPs. obtainsSupportFrom S0332586524000039 assertion.
• Alternating%20Dat-Nom%2FNom-Dat%20verbs%20in%20Icelandic%20instantiate%20the%20Nom-Dat%20construction%2054%25%20of%20the%20time%20and%20the%20Dat-Nom%20construction%2046%25%20of%20the%20time%20on%20average%20for%20four%20of%20five%20verbs%20when%20both%20arguments%20are%20full%20NPs. obtainsSupportFrom JXMG1M assertion.
• In%20configurations%20with%20a%20nominative%20pronoun%2C%20the%20Nom-Dat%20construction%20takes%20precedence%20over%20the%20Dat-Nom%20construction%20for%20alternating%20verbs. obtainsSupportFrom S0332586524000039 assertion.
• In%20configurations%20with%20a%20nominative%20pronoun%2C%20the%20Nom-Dat%20construction%20takes%20precedence%20over%20the%20Dat-Nom%20construction%20for%20alternating%20verbs. obtainsSupportFrom JXMG1M assertion.
• For%20the%20double-NP%20configuration%20with%20alternating%20verbs%2C%20indefiniteness%20and%20length%20are%20key%20predictors%20of%20argument%20structure%20alternation%2C%20alongside%20nominative%20case%20marking. obtainsSupportFrom S0332586524000039 assertion.
• For%20the%20double-NP%20configuration%20with%20alternating%20verbs%2C%20indefiniteness%20and%20length%20are%20key%20predictors%20of%20argument%20structure%20alternation%2C%20alongside%20nominative%20case%20marking. obtainsSupportFrom JXMG1M assertion.
• Nominative%20case%20marking%20systematically%20correlates%20with%20discourse-prominence%20for%20alternating%20verbs. obtainsSupportFrom S0332586524000039 assertion.
• Nominative%20case%20marking%20systematically%20correlates%20with%20discourse-prominence%20for%20alternating%20verbs. obtainsSupportFrom JXMG1M assertion.
• Discourse-prominence%20correlates%20with%20topicality%20for%20alternating%20verbs. obtainsSupportFrom S0332586524000039 assertion.
• Discourse-prominence%20correlates%20with%20topicality%20for%20alternating%20verbs. obtainsSupportFrom JXMG1M assertion.
• The%20verb%20%27henta%27%20behaves%20as%20an%20outlier%20among%20alternating%20Dat-Nom%2FNom-Dat%20verbs%2C%20showing%20a%20strong%20preference%20for%20the%20Nom-Dat%20construction. obtainsSupportFrom S0332586524000039 assertion.
• The%20verb%20%27henta%27%20behaves%20as%20an%20outlier%20among%20alternating%20Dat-Nom%2FNom-Dat%20verbs%2C%20showing%20a%20strong%20preference%20for%20the%20Nom-Dat%20construction. obtainsSupportFrom JXMG1M assertion.
• Out%20of%20800%20nominative%20constituents%2C%20a%20mere%2014%20are%20animate. obtainsSupportFrom S0332586524000039 assertion.
• Out%20of%20800%20nominative%20constituents%2C%20a%20mere%2014%20are%20animate. obtainsSupportFrom JXMG1M assertion.
• Of%2014%20animate%20nominatives%2C%2011%20%28or%2079%25%29%20are%20attested%20in%20the%20Nom-Dat%20order%2C%20and%20three%20%28or%2021%25%29%20in%20the%20reverse%20Dat-Nom%20order. obtainsSupportFrom S0332586524000039 assertion.
• Of%2014%20animate%20nominatives%2C%2011%20%28or%2079%25%29%20are%20attested%20in%20the%20Nom-Dat%20order%2C%20and%20three%20%28or%2021%25%29%20in%20the%20reverse%20Dat-Nom%20order. obtainsSupportFrom JXMG1M assertion.
• The%20dative%20is%20hardly%20ever%20inanimate%20%2819%20out%20of%20800%20tokens%29. obtainsSupportFrom S0332586524000039 assertion.
• The%20dative%20is%20hardly%20ever%20inanimate%20%2819%20out%20of%20800%20tokens%29. obtainsSupportFrom JXMG1M assertion.

• first
• previous
• next