Nanopublications LDF server

Matches in Nanopublications for { ?s <http://purl.org/spar/cito/obtainsSupportFrom> ?o ?g. }

• Sestrin%203%20%28Sesn3%29%20shows%20increased%20expression%20in%20the%20short%20photoperiod%20%28SP%29%20and%20photorefractory%20%28PR%29%20groups%20in%20Svalbard%20ptarmigan. obtainsSupportFrom s00359-024-01716-3 assertion.
• Sestrin%203%20%28Sesn3%29%20shows%20increased%20expression%20in%20the%20short%20photoperiod%20%28SP%29%20and%20photorefractory%20%28PR%29%20groups%20in%20Svalbard%20ptarmigan. obtainsSupportFrom M82D10 assertion.
• Pitchfork%20%28Pifo%29%20shows%20decreased%20expression%20in%20the%20short%20photoperiod%20%28SP%29%20and%20photorefractory%20%28PR%29%20states%20in%20Svalbard%20ptarmigan. obtainsSupportFrom s00359-024-01716-3 assertion.
• Pitchfork%20%28Pifo%29%20shows%20decreased%20expression%20in%20the%20short%20photoperiod%20%28SP%29%20and%20photorefractory%20%28PR%29%20states%20in%20Svalbard%20ptarmigan. obtainsSupportFrom M82D10 assertion.
• Neither%20technical%20immersion%20nor%20expertise%20level%20as%20independent%20variables%20were%20found%20to%20have%20a%20significant%20effect%20in%20the%20relationship%20of%20the%20assessment%20predicting%20the%20training%20transfer. obtainsSupportFrom s10055-024-01058-0 assertion.
• Neither%20technical%20immersion%20nor%20expertise%20level%20as%20independent%20variables%20were%20found%20to%20have%20a%20significant%20effect%20in%20the%20relationship%20of%20the%20assessment%20predicting%20the%20training%20transfer. obtainsSupportFrom USN.25442119 assertion.
• The%20direct%20relationship%20between%20VR%20simulator%20assessment%20and%20training%20transfer%20was%20significant%20%28R2_adj%20%3D%200.436%29. obtainsSupportFrom s10055-024-01058-0 assertion.
• The%20direct%20relationship%20between%20VR%20simulator%20assessment%20and%20training%20transfer%20was%20significant%20%28R2_adj%20%3D%200.436%29. obtainsSupportFrom USN.25442119 assertion.
• Motivation%20as%20a%20covariate%20improved%20the%20regression%20model%2C%20resulting%20in%20a%20moderation%20model%20with%20a%20decent%20effect%20size%20%28R2%20%3D%200.740%29. obtainsSupportFrom s10055-024-01058-0 assertion.
• Motivation%20as%20a%20covariate%20improved%20the%20regression%20model%2C%20resulting%20in%20a%20moderation%20model%20with%20a%20decent%20effect%20size%20%28R2%20%3D%200.740%29. obtainsSupportFrom USN.25442119 assertion.
• Both%20types%20of%20VR%20simulations%20used%20for%20assessment%20demonstrate%20concurrent%20validity%20in%20predicting%20real-life%20performance. obtainsSupportFrom s10055-024-01058-0 assertion.
• Both%20types%20of%20VR%20simulations%20used%20for%20assessment%20demonstrate%20concurrent%20validity%20in%20predicting%20real-life%20performance. obtainsSupportFrom USN.25442119 assertion.
• The%20HMD%20VR%20assessment%20condition%20can%20predict%20the%20transfer%20condition%20regardless%20of%20expertise%20level. obtainsSupportFrom s10055-024-01058-0 assertion.
• The%20HMD%20VR%20assessment%20condition%20can%20predict%20the%20transfer%20condition%20regardless%20of%20expertise%20level. obtainsSupportFrom USN.25442119 assertion.
• Motivation%20prior%20to%20the%20training%20transfer%20scenario%20moderates%20the%20relationship%20between%20assessment%20and%20training%20transfer%2C%20with%20higher%20motivation%20diminishing%20the%20predictive%20strength%20of%20assessment%20scores. obtainsSupportFrom s10055-024-01058-0 assertion.
• Motivation%20prior%20to%20the%20training%20transfer%20scenario%20moderates%20the%20relationship%20between%20assessment%20and%20training%20transfer%2C%20with%20higher%20motivation%20diminishing%20the%20predictive%20strength%20of%20assessment%20scores. obtainsSupportFrom USN.25442119 assertion.
• Post-introduction%20clones%20matured%20earlier%20than%20the%20pre-introduction%20clones. obtainsSupportFrom s10682-020-10031-7 assertion.
• Post-introduction%20clones%20matured%20earlier%20than%20the%20pre-introduction%20clones. obtainsSupportFrom EC1C5E assertion.
• Post-introduction%20clones%20had%20faster%20growth%20prior%20to%20maturation%20than%20pre-introduction%20clones. obtainsSupportFrom s10682-020-10031-7 assertion.
• Post-introduction%20clones%20had%20faster%20growth%20prior%20to%20maturation%20than%20pre-introduction%20clones. obtainsSupportFrom EC1C5E assertion.
• Post-introduction%20clones%20showed%20higher%20clutch%20size%20for%20the%202nd%20and%203rd%20clutch. obtainsSupportFrom s10682-020-10031-7 assertion.
• Post-introduction%20clones%20showed%20higher%20clutch%20size%20for%20the%202nd%20and%203rd%20clutch. obtainsSupportFrom EC1C5E assertion.
• Post-introduction%20clones%20exhibited%20slower%20growth%20from%20maturation%20to%20the%20moult%20after%20the%20release%20of%20the%20first%20clutch. obtainsSupportFrom s10682-020-10031-7 assertion.
• Post-introduction%20clones%20exhibited%20slower%20growth%20from%20maturation%20to%20the%20moult%20after%20the%20release%20of%20the%20first%20clutch. obtainsSupportFrom EC1C5E assertion.
• The%20length%20threshold%20for%2050%25%20maturation%20probability%20remained%20unchanged%20post-introduction. obtainsSupportFrom s10682-020-10031-7 assertion.
• The%20length%20threshold%20for%2050%25%20maturation%20probability%20remained%20unchanged%20post-introduction. obtainsSupportFrom EC1C5E assertion.
• Egg%20size%20did%20not%20differ%20between%20pre-%20and%20post-introduction%20clones. obtainsSupportFrom s10682-020-10031-7 assertion.
• Egg%20size%20did%20not%20differ%20between%20pre-%20and%20post-introduction%20clones. obtainsSupportFrom EC1C5E assertion.
• Post-introduction%20clones%20had%20a%20higher%20maturation%20probability%20during%20the%20third%20observed%20instar. obtainsSupportFrom s10682-020-10031-7 assertion.
• Post-introduction%20clones%20had%20a%20higher%20maturation%20probability%20during%20the%20third%20observed%20instar. obtainsSupportFrom EC1C5E assertion.
• Charring%20rates%20for%20the%20flanges%20were%200.40%E2%80%930.76%20mm%2Fmin%20and%200.54%E2%80%931.72%20mm%2Fmin%20for%20the%20protected%20and%20post-protected%20phase%2C%20respectively. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• Charring%20rates%20for%20the%20flanges%20were%200.40%E2%80%930.76%20mm%2Fmin%20and%200.54%E2%80%931.72%20mm%2Fmin%20for%20the%20protected%20and%20post-protected%20phase%2C%20respectively. obtainsSupportFrom 2O7QSP assertion.
• Charring%20rates%20decreased%20with%20increasing%20flange%20size. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• Charring%20rates%20decreased%20with%20increasing%20flange%20size. obtainsSupportFrom 2O7QSP assertion.
• Charring%20rates%20for%20flanges%20of%20solid%20wood%20and%20LVL%20were%20comparable. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• Charring%20rates%20for%20flanges%20of%20solid%20wood%20and%20LVL%20were%20comparable. obtainsSupportFrom 2O7QSP assertion.
• Lateral%20charring%20of%20I-joist%20flanges%20can%20be%20significant%20in%20the%20protected%20phase. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• Lateral%20charring%20of%20I-joist%20flanges%20can%20be%20significant%20in%20the%20protected%20phase. obtainsSupportFrom 2O7QSP assertion.
• The%20tested%20insulation%20products%20showed%20a%20lower%20recession%20rate%20than%20values%20reported%20for%20glass%20wool%20insulation. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• The%20tested%20insulation%20products%20showed%20a%20lower%20recession%20rate%20than%20values%20reported%20for%20glass%20wool%20insulation. obtainsSupportFrom 2O7QSP assertion.
• The%20low%20recession%20rates%20compared%20to%20previously%20reported%20generic%20values%20can%20be%20explained%20by%20better%20product-specific%20properties%2C%20negligible%20shrinking%2C%20and%20a%20slightly%20different%20test%20setup. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• The%20low%20recession%20rates%20compared%20to%20previously%20reported%20generic%20values%20can%20be%20explained%20by%20better%20product-specific%20properties%2C%20negligible%20shrinking%2C%20and%20a%20slightly%20different%20test%20setup. obtainsSupportFrom 2O7QSP assertion.
• Charring%20rates%20in%20the%20protected%20phase%20were%20on%20average%200.14%20mm%2Fmin%20lower%20than%20predicted%20by%20EN%201995-1-2%20and%200.05%20mm%2Fmin%20lower%20than%20predicted%20by%20prEN%201995-1-2. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• Charring%20rates%20in%20the%20protected%20phase%20were%20on%20average%200.14%20mm%2Fmin%20lower%20than%20predicted%20by%20EN%201995-1-2%20and%200.05%20mm%2Fmin%20lower%20than%20predicted%20by%20prEN%201995-1-2. obtainsSupportFrom 2O7QSP assertion.
• Recession%20rate%20of%20insulation%20measured%20at%20flange%20corners%20was%20lower%20than%20in%20the%20middle%20of%20the%20insulation. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• Recession%20rate%20of%20insulation%20measured%20at%20flange%20corners%20was%20lower%20than%20in%20the%20middle%20of%20the%20insulation. obtainsSupportFrom 2O7QSP assertion.
• Insulation%20fall-down%20occurred%20after%20gypsum%20board%20fall-off%2C%20with%20cellulose%20loose-fill%20remaining%20in%20place%20longer%20than%20wood%20fibre%20loose-fill. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• Insulation%20fall-down%20occurred%20after%20gypsum%20board%20fall-off%2C%20with%20cellulose%20loose-fill%20remaining%20in%20place%20longer%20than%20wood%20fibre%20loose-fill. obtainsSupportFrom 2O7QSP assertion.
• The%20compression%20and%20oversizing%20of%20wood%20fibre%20batt%20insulation%20helped%20prevent%20fall-down%20during%20testing. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• The%20compression%20and%20oversizing%20of%20wood%20fibre%20batt%20insulation%20helped%20prevent%20fall-down%20during%20testing. obtainsSupportFrom 2O7QSP assertion.
• The%20charring%20rates%20for%20an%20I-joist%20with%20flanges%20of%20solid%20wood%20and%20Laminated%20Veneer%20Lumber%20are%20comparable. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• The%20charring%20rates%20for%20an%20I-joist%20with%20flanges%20of%20solid%20wood%20and%20Laminated%20Veneer%20Lumber%20are%20comparable. obtainsSupportFrom 2O7QSP assertion.
• The%20charring%20rates%20in%20the%20protected%20phase%20varied%20between%200.40%20mm%2Fmin%20and%200.76%20mm%2Fmin. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• The%20charring%20rates%20in%20the%20protected%20phase%20varied%20between%200.40%20mm%2Fmin%20and%200.76%20mm%2Fmin. obtainsSupportFrom 2O7QSP assertion.
• The%20charring%20rate%20decreased%20with%20increasing%20flange%20size. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• The%20charring%20rate%20decreased%20with%20increasing%20flange%20size. obtainsSupportFrom 2O7QSP assertion.
• The%20charring%20rate%20during%20the%20post-protected%20phase%20varied%20from%200.54%20mm%2Fmin%20to%201.72%20mm%2Fmin. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• The%20charring%20rate%20during%20the%20post-protected%20phase%20varied%20from%200.54%20mm%2Fmin%20to%201.72%20mm%2Fmin. obtainsSupportFrom 2O7QSP assertion.
• The%20uncertainty%20of%20the%20measurements%20was%20highest%20for%20the%20post-protected%20phase. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• The%20uncertainty%20of%20the%20measurements%20was%20highest%20for%20the%20post-protected%20phase. obtainsSupportFrom 2O7QSP assertion.
• All%20charring%20rates%20of%20the%20I-joists%20in%20the%20protected%20phase%20were%20lower%20than%20the%20calculated%20values%20of%20rectangular%20cross-sections%20in%20EN%201995-1-2%3A2004. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• All%20charring%20rates%20of%20the%20I-joists%20in%20the%20protected%20phase%20were%20lower%20than%20the%20calculated%20values%20of%20rectangular%20cross-sections%20in%20EN%201995-1-2%3A2004. obtainsSupportFrom 2O7QSP assertion.
• Compared%20to%20the%20new%20design%20method%20for%20I-joists%20in%20the%20final%20draft%20of%20prEN%201995-1-2%3A2021%2C%20there%20was%20a%20better%20match%20between%20experimental%20and%20calculated%20charring%20rates%20and%20the%20discrepancies%20were%20mainly%20on%20the%20conservative%20side. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• Compared%20to%20the%20new%20design%20method%20for%20I-joists%20in%20the%20final%20draft%20of%20prEN%201995-1-2%3A2021%2C%20there%20was%20a%20better%20match%20between%20experimental%20and%20calculated%20charring%20rates%20and%20the%20discrepancies%20were%20mainly%20on%20the%20conservative%20side. obtainsSupportFrom 2O7QSP assertion.
• The%20remaining%20cross-section%20area%20of%20all%20I-joist%20flanges%20had%20a%20trapezoid-like%20or%20rounded%20shape%2C%20which%20is%20characteristic%20of%20lateral%20charring. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• The%20remaining%20cross-section%20area%20of%20all%20I-joist%20flanges%20had%20a%20trapezoid-like%20or%20rounded%20shape%2C%20which%20is%20characteristic%20of%20lateral%20charring. obtainsSupportFrom 2O7QSP assertion.
• Several%20flanges%20were%20heavily%20charred%20on%20the%20lateral%20side%2C%20although%20there%20was%20barely%20any%20post-protected%20phase. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• Several%20flanges%20were%20heavily%20charred%20on%20the%20lateral%20side%2C%20although%20there%20was%20barely%20any%20post-protected%20phase. obtainsSupportFrom 2O7QSP assertion.
• Lateral%20charring%20of%20the%20flanges%20of%20an%20I-joist%20can%20be%20significant%20in%20the%20protected%20phase. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• Lateral%20charring%20of%20the%20flanges%20of%20an%20I-joist%20can%20be%20significant%20in%20the%20protected%20phase. obtainsSupportFrom 2O7QSP assertion.
• Overall%2C%20the%20insulation%20stayed%20well%20in%20place%20after%20gypsum%20board%20fall-off. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• Overall%2C%20the%20insulation%20stayed%20well%20in%20place%20after%20gypsum%20board%20fall-off. obtainsSupportFrom 2O7QSP assertion.
• In%20most%20tests%2C%20the%20insulation%20was%20still%20in%20its%20place%20at%20the%20end%20of%20the%20test. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• In%20most%20tests%2C%20the%20insulation%20was%20still%20in%20its%20place%20at%20the%20end%20of%20the%20test. obtainsSupportFrom 2O7QSP assertion.
• The%20I-joist%20profile%20has%20a%20positive%20impact%20on%20keeping%20the%20insulation%20in%20its%20place. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• The%20I-joist%20profile%20has%20a%20positive%20impact%20on%20keeping%20the%20insulation%20in%20its%20place. obtainsSupportFrom 2O7QSP assertion.
• All%20four%20insulation%20products%20showed%20a%20lower%20recession%20rate%20than%20typical%20values%20reported%20for%20glass%20wool%20insulation. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• All%20four%20insulation%20products%20showed%20a%20lower%20recession%20rate%20than%20typical%20values%20reported%20for%20glass%20wool%20insulation. obtainsSupportFrom 2O7QSP assertion.
• The%20difference%20in%20recession%20rates%20was%20more%20pronounced%20for%20the%20wood%20fibre%20and%20cellulose%20insulations. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• The%20difference%20in%20recession%20rates%20was%20more%20pronounced%20for%20the%20wood%20fibre%20and%20cellulose%20insulations. obtainsSupportFrom 2O7QSP assertion.
• The%20recession%20rates%20were%20at%20the%20lower%20end%20of%20previously%20reported%20values%20for%20these%20types%20of%20insulation. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• The%20recession%20rates%20were%20at%20the%20lower%20end%20of%20previously%20reported%20values%20for%20these%20types%20of%20insulation. obtainsSupportFrom 2O7QSP assertion.
• The%20cellulose%20loose-fill%20insulation%20had%20the%20lowest%20recession%20rate%20at%201.1%20mm%2Fmin. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• The%20cellulose%20loose-fill%20insulation%20had%20the%20lowest%20recession%20rate%20at%201.1%20mm%2Fmin. obtainsSupportFrom 2O7QSP assertion.
• The%20cellulose%20loose-fill%20insulation%20recession%20rate%20of%201.1%20mm%2Fmin%20is%20lower%20than%20any%20value%20reported%20previously%20for%20combustible%20insulations. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• The%20cellulose%20loose-fill%20insulation%20recession%20rate%20of%201.1%20mm%2Fmin%20is%20lower%20than%20any%20value%20reported%20previously%20for%20combustible%20insulations. obtainsSupportFrom 2O7QSP assertion.
• The%20recession%20rates%20in%20this%20test%20series%20were%20mainly%20measured%20in%20the%20protected%20phase%2C%20while%20reported%20values%20are%20often%20reported%20for%20the%20post-protected%20phase. obtainsSupportFrom s10694-023-01464-x assertion.
• The%20recession%20rates%20in%20this%20test%20series%20were%20mainly%20measured%20in%20the%20protected%20phase%2C%20while%20reported%20values%20are%20often%20reported%20for%20the%20post-protected%20phase. obtainsSupportFrom 2O7QSP assertion.
• The%20electronic%20density%20of%20the%20target%20region%20converges%20with%20cluster%20size%20although%20the%20energy%20of%20the%20target%20region%20does%20not. obtainsSupportFrom s10910-022-01351-w assertion.
• The%20electronic%20density%20of%20the%20target%20region%20converges%20with%20cluster%20size%20although%20the%20energy%20of%20the%20target%20region%20does%20not. obtainsSupportFrom UOTXTK assertion.
• The%20Hartree%E2%80%93Fock%20electric%20dipole%20moment%20of%20the%20target%20region%20converges%20upon%20the%20inclusion%20of%20approximately%20three%20shells%20beyond%20the%20target%20region. obtainsSupportFrom s10910-022-01351-w assertion.
• The%20Hartree%E2%80%93Fock%20electric%20dipole%20moment%20of%20the%20target%20region%20converges%20upon%20the%20inclusion%20of%20approximately%20three%20shells%20beyond%20the%20target%20region. obtainsSupportFrom UOTXTK assertion.
• Convergence%20of%20CC2-in-HF%20vertical%20excitation%20energies%20for%20the%20target%20region%20is%20achieved%20with%20approximately%20three%20shells%20beyond%20the%20target%20region. obtainsSupportFrom s10910-022-01351-w assertion.
• Convergence%20of%20CC2-in-HF%20vertical%20excitation%20energies%20for%20the%20target%20region%20is%20achieved%20with%20approximately%20three%20shells%20beyond%20the%20target%20region. obtainsSupportFrom UOTXTK assertion.
• The%20choice%20of%20basis%20set%20in%20shells%20beyond%20the%20target%20region%20has%20a%20negligible%20effect%20on%20the%20Hartree%E2%80%93Fock%20dipole%20moment%20of%20the%20target%20region%20when%20a%20high-quality%20basis%20set%20is%20used%20for%20the%20target%20itself. obtainsSupportFrom s10910-022-01351-w assertion.
• The%20choice%20of%20basis%20set%20in%20shells%20beyond%20the%20target%20region%20has%20a%20negligible%20effect%20on%20the%20Hartree%E2%80%93Fock%20dipole%20moment%20of%20the%20target%20region%20when%20a%20high-quality%20basis%20set%20is%20used%20for%20the%20target%20itself. obtainsSupportFrom UOTXTK assertion.
• For%20CC2-in-HF%20vertical%20excitation%20energies%2C%20the%20basis%20set%20quality%20in%20shell%201%20is%20more%20critical%20than%20in%20shell%202. obtainsSupportFrom s10910-022-01351-w assertion.
• For%20CC2-in-HF%20vertical%20excitation%20energies%2C%20the%20basis%20set%20quality%20in%20shell%201%20is%20more%20critical%20than%20in%20shell%202. obtainsSupportFrom UOTXTK assertion.
• A%20minimal%20basis%20description%20of%20the%20outer%20shells%20%28shell%203%2B%29%20is%20sufficient%20to%20capture%20the%20correct%20interaction%20with%20the%20target%20region%20for%20calculating%20electronic%20properties. obtainsSupportFrom s10910-022-01351-w assertion.
• A%20minimal%20basis%20description%20of%20the%20outer%20shells%20%28shell%203%2B%29%20is%20sufficient%20to%20capture%20the%20correct%20interaction%20with%20the%20target%20region%20for%20calculating%20electronic%20properties. obtainsSupportFrom UOTXTK assertion.

• first
• previous
• next